<p class="western" align="justify"></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Baskerville Old Face, Baskerville Old Face, serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b>Massima</b></span></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Baskerville Old Face, Baskerville Old Face, serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><i>La Pubblica Amministrazione è tenuta ad accertare – massime nelle fattispecie di procedimento ad istanza del privato – se l’interesse di quest’ultimo sia o meno compatibile con l’interesse pubblico; ciò non già </i></span></span><span style="font-family: Baskerville Old Face, Baskerville Old Face, serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">sine die</span></span><span style="font-family: Baskerville Old Face, Baskerville Old Face, serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><i>, quanto piuttosto secondo una sequenza cronologica prefissata dal legislatore che – tra le altre cose – annovera un termine finale al cui spirare affiora una vera e propria responsabilità dell’Amministrazione medesima; essa si atteggia diversamente a seconda della relativa riconducibilità ad un atto lecito, quantunque dannoso, ovvero ad un vero e proprio illecito: nel primo caso la conseguenza (automatica) è – per talune fattispecie - un indennizzo collegato al mero ritardo procedimentale, mentre nel secondo scatta l’obbligo di risarcire al privato istante il danno che sia conseguenza immediata e diretta di un ritardo procedimentale doloso o quanto meno colposo della PA; fatta salva, in quest’ultima evenienza (come, in qualche modo, anche nella prima), la necessità di verificare la natura aquiliana, ovvero “contrattuale”, della ridetta, pertinente responsabilità pubblica, con quanto ne consegue in tema di onere della prova.</i></span></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b>Crono-articolo</b></span></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>1942</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 16 marzo viene varato il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>R.D. n.267</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, nuovo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>codice civile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (entrato in vigore il 21 aprile), che qualifica il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> quale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>peculiare forma di inadempimento dell’obbligazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, implicante la nascita in capo al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>creditore</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diritto al risarcimento del danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">: ai sensi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’art.1218</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> infatti il debitore che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non esegue esattamente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prestazione dovuta</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è tenuto al </span><a href="https://www.brocardi.it/dizionario/3912.html"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento del danno</b></span></a><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, se </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non prova</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l'<a href="https://www.brocardi.it/dizionario/4835.html">inadempimento</a> o il <a href="https://www.brocardi.it/dizionario/3515.html">ritardo</a></b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è stato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>determinato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b><a href="https://www.brocardi.it/dizionario/1569.html">impossibilità</a> della prestazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> derivante da </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>causa <a href="https://www.brocardi.it/dizionario/1569.html">a lui non imputabile</a></b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, configurando dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> come </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ipotesi qualificata</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>inesatta esecuzione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>ratione temporis</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prestazione dovuta</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al creditore, con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>onere della prova liberatoria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (non imputabilità del ritardo) a carico </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>del debitore</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Più specificamente poi, ai sensi del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>successivo art.1224</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nelle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>obbligazioni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che hanno per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>oggetto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>somma di danaro</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (c.d. obbligazioni </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pecuniarie</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">), sono dovuti da debitore – muovendo dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giorno della <a href="https://www.brocardi.it/dizionario/1583.html">mora</a></b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e, dunque, per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tutto il ritardo maturato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> rispetto alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>scadenza del termine di pagamento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> - gli </span><a href="https://www.brocardi.it/dizionario/3589.html"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interessi legali</b></span></a><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> anche se </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non erano dovuti precedentemente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e anche se il creditore </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non prova</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di aver sofferto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>alcun danno </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">(risarcimento </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>forfetario e predeterminato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">); se </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prima della mora</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> erano dovuti </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interessi in misura superiore a quella legale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, gli </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interessi moratori</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (e, dunque, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) sono poi dovuti </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nella stessa misura</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, mentre al creditore che dimostra di aver </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>subito un danno maggiore</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> spetta </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l'ulteriore risarcimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che tuttavia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non è dovuto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> se è stata </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>convenuta tra le parti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>misura degli interessi moratori</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Importante poi anche il successivo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art.1457</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> alla cui stregua se il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b><a href="https://www.brocardi.it/dizionario/1912.html">termine</a> fissato per la prestazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di una delle parti </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>in seno ad un contratto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> deve considerarsi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b><a href="https://www.brocardi.it/dizionario/1805.html">essenziale</a> nell'interesse dell'altra</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, questa, salvo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>patto o uso contrario</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, se vuole </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>esigerne l'esecuzione nonostante la scadenza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del termine (e, dunque, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nonostante il ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">), deve </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>darne notizia all'altra parte</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> entro </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>3 giorni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; in </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mancanza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il contratto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>si intende risoluto di diritto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> anche se </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non è stata espressamente pattuita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risoluzione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>1948</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 01 gennaio entra in vigore la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Costituzione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> repubblicana, che prevede una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>riserve di legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in tema di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>organizzazione dei pubblici uffici</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, in modo da </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>assicurare l’imparzialità ed il buon andamento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (art.97) della Pubblica Amministrazione, la quale a rigore </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non può dunque concludere procedimenti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (con connessa </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>erogazione </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">(o mancata erogazione) </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>di beni e servizi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ai privati istanti) </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rispettando i termini</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per taluno e </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non rispettandoli</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per talaltro. Su un piano </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>più generale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> importante anche </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’art. 28</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, alla cui stregua </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>i funzionari e i dipendenti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dello </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Stato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e degli </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>enti pubblici</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sono </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>direttamente responsabili</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, secondo le </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>leggi penali, civili e amministrative</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, degli </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>atti compiuti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>violazione di diritti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ed in caso di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità civile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, essa (a differenza di quella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>penale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ed </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>amministrativa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>si estende</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> allo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Stato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e agli </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>enti pubblici</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di appartenenza.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>1990</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 7 agosto viene varata la legge 241 in tema di procedimento amministrativo, il cui art.2 prevede che ove il procedimento consegua obbligatoriamente ad una istanza, ovvero debba essere iniziato d'ufficio, la pubblica amministrazione ha il dovere di concluderlo mediante l'adozione di un provvedimento espresso; in particolare, stando al comma 2 le PPAA determinano per ciascun tipo di procedimento, in quanto non sia già direttamente disposto per legge o per regolamento, il termine entro cui esso deve concludersi, termine che decorre dall'inizio di ufficio del procedimento o dal ricevimento della domanda se il procedimento e' ad iniziativa di parte, e che va reso pubblico secondo quanto previsto dall’ordinamento di ciascuna singola PA; qualora peraltro le PPAA non provvedano ai sensi del comma 2, il termine fissato ex lege dal comma 3 è pari a 30 giorni. </span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>1997</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 15 marzo esce la legge n.59, recante </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>delega al Governo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conferimento di funzioni e compiti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> alle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Regioni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ed </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>enti locali</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, per la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>riforma della Pubblica Amministrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e per la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>semplificazione amministrativa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art.17, comma 1, lettera f)</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>delega </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">appunto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il Governo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> a prevedere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>forme di indennizzo automatico e forfettario</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per i casi di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mancato rispetto del termine del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mancata o ritardata adozione del provvedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">: si tratta di una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>forma indennitaria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>assume a proprio presupposto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mero fatto dell’inadempimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>obbligo di provvedere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e dunque in sostanza il “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>mero ritardo”</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della PA, senza che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>venga conferito alcun peso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>valutazione sostanziale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di maggiore o minore </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fondatezza della pretesa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> spiccata dal soggetto privato, e dunque di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>minore o maggiore compatibilità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>relativo interesse</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>quello pubblico</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Una delega che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non verrà attuata</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, forse anche per i </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dubbi ermeneutici</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>medesima impostazione sistematica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che essa solleva: il termine “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>indennizzo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">” fa peraltro pensare ad una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità della PA per atto lecito</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, nel quale si compendierebbe appunto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il mero ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, circostanza che, nondimeno, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anche in dottrina</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> non trova tutti d’accordo.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2004</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 6 luglio esce la nota sentenza della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Corte costituzionale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> n.</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>204</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, che riconosce la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legittimità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>previsione di giurisdizione esclusiva</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in capo al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>GA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> solo al cospetto della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>spendita di un potere in capo alla Pubblica Amministrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Si tratta di una pronuncia che innescherà, in una prima fase, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il dubbio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (poi superato) che il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento del danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> derivante da </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>silenzio della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> o da </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo perpetrato da quest’ultima</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, configurandosi essi quali </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>meri comportamenti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (e non già quali atti o provvedimenti), </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non possa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dare la stura a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>controversie appannaggio del GA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, quanto piuttosto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>del GO</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2005</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 7 marzo esce l’ordinanza della IV sezione del Consiglio di Stato n.875 che, nel </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rimettere all’Adunanza Plenaria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> delle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>importanti questioni interpretative</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in tema di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, elabora una propria </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tripartizione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per quanto riguarda </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tale</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pregiudizio </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">(da ritardo appunto), onde si configura un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da tardiva adozione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento legittimo sfavorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il privato (che dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ha atteso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sentirsi legittimamente dire di no</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dalla PA); in questa ipotesi si parla di “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>danno da mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”, in quanto ad </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>essere leso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interesse meramente procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del privato istante, avente ad oggetto la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tempestiva conclusione</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ex </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art.2 della legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, senza </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>in alcun modo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> considerare </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’effettiva lesione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del proprio </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interesse sostanziale al conseguimento del bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (che gli è stato del resto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legittimamente negato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">); un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da tardiva adozione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento legittimo favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il privato (che dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ha atteso per sentirsi dire legittimamente di si</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dalla PA); un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, infine,</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b> da mancata adozione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>alcun provvedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> pur </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>richiesto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al privato, e dunque un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno scaturigine del “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>silenzio</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>inerzia</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della PA. Per il Collegio, il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> va più in specie ricostruito come </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conseguenza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>violazione dell’interesse del privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rispetto dei tempi di definizione della pertinente istanza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> siccome </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prescritti dalla legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nel relativo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>bacino procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e ciò muovendo dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>natura “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>contrattuale</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, da ricondursi ad un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>contatto amministrativo qualificato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, onde </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’affidamento riposto dal privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>certezza dei tempi dell’azione amministrativa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> appare – nella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>realtà economica contemporanea</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e secondo la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>moderna concezione del c.d. rapporto amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interesse meritevole di tutela di per sé</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> considerato, non apparendo al Collegio </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sufficiente relegare</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> simile tutela alla previsione ed alla concreta azionabilità di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>strumenti processuali di tipo propulsivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, i quali presuppongono la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sola ottica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (in qualche modo “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>reale</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”) del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conseguimento dell’utilità finale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">,e che tuttavia si palesano </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nel medesimo tempo assai meno appaganti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con riguardo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>all’interesse</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (“</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>obbligatorio</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”) del privato istante a vedere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>definita con cronologica certezza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la propria </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>posizione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con riguardo alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>specifica istanza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di volta in volta spiccata nei confronti della PA e, in caso contrario, a vedersi risarcita la lesione </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’interesse</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> a tale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>cronologica certezza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sotteso. Il Consiglio di Stato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rimette tuttavia all’Adunanza Plenaria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la questione afferente al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concreto atteggiarsi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e, in specie, alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>configurabilità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da mero ritardo della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, che abbia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procrastinato il procedimento oltre</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> i </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termini legalmente prescritti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 31 marzo esce la sentenza delle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>SSUU</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della Cassazione n.6745 alla cui stregua sia le </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>controversie</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcitorie</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> scaturite da c.d. </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>silenzio della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, sia quelle conseguenti ad un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, devono assumersi avere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ad oggetto l’esercizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – o, più precisamente, il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mancato esercizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>poteri autoritativi pubblici</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, funzionali al perseguimento </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’interesse pubblico</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, certamente rientranti nell’ambito della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giurisdizione del GA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 15 settembre esce la sentenza dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Adunanza Plenaria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del Consiglio di Stato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>n.7</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, alla cui stregua deve assumersi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non risarcibile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da c.d. “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della PA nella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conclusione del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Per il Collegio il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo è risarcibile solo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> allorché affiori la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>spettanza in capo al privato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>connesso bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che vi è </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sotteso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, mentre all’opposto laddove </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il provvedimento “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>ritardato</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sfavorevole</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> si configura </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nessun diritto autonomo al risarcimento del danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e ciò atteso come il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sistema di tutela degli interessi pretensivi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – nelle ipotesi in cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>si fa affidamento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sulle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>statuizioni del giudice</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per la relativa realizzazione – consenta il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>passaggio a riparazioni per equivalente solo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> quando </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’interesse pretensivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> considerato, incapace di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>trovare realizzazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’atto (favorevole)</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, in </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>congiunzione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’interesse pubblico</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, assuma a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>proprio oggetto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tutela di interessi sostanziali</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e, perciò, la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mancata adozione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> o il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo nella adozione di un provvedimento vantaggioso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per l’interessato (suscettibile di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>appagare un c.d. bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell’interessato medesimo). Per il Collegio, più in specie, va </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>escluso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tempo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> stesso della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sequenza procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>autonomamente considerato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, possa essere assunto quale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>bene della vita tutelabile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in via </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcitoria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> laddove </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>leso dal ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e ciò perché – con riguardo a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ciascun procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – affiora </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>un solo bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che si identifica in </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>quello di cui all’istanza del privato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> rimasta </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>inevasa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ovvero </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>evasa con ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dalla competente Amministrazione, sicché si ha </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo solo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> se si accerta la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>spettanza del ridetto (unico) bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ottenibile giusta </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento vantaggioso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> adottato dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>PA procedente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Sotto il profilo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>processuale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, la Plenaria </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conferma</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> quanto già affermato in marzo dalle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>SSUU della Cassazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, onde sia le </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>controversie</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcitorie</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> scaturite da c.d. </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>silenzio della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, sia quelle conseguenti ad un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, devono assumersi avere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ad oggetto l’esercizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – o, più precisamente, il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mancato esercizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>poteri autoritativi pubblici</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, funzionali al perseguimento </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’interesse pubblico</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, certamente rientranti nell’ambito della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giurisdizione del GA</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2007</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 22 febbraio esce la sentenza della III sezione del Tar Puglia, Lecce, n.623, che si occupa della fattispecie in cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>la PA adotti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tardivamente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento legittimo favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al privato, che dunque ha dovuto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>attendere per sentirsi accogliere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> l’istanza a suo tempo presentata alla PA medesima. Per il Tar in queste ipotesi, laddove il privato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>invochi il danno da ritardato rilascio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento a lui favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il GA </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non deve</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>limitarsi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>meramente accertare l’illegittimità formale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del provvedimento dal punto di vista della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>violazione del termine procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ma deve piuttosto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>acclarare se vi sia colpa</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>– apparato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della PA e dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rimproverabilità del ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>condotta pubblica inescusabile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, magari </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>scusata invece</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dallo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>stesso contegno del privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Come chiosa infatti la dottrina, occorre tenere presente il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rapporto di collaborazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che sovente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>avvince la PA e il privato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, onde il termine </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>potrebbe essere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dalla seconda </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>superato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> non già per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anomalie dell’azione pubblica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, quanto piuttosto per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>esigenze obiettive</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ovvero perché magari </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conosce la complessità della fattispecie</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, nello svolgere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anche informalmente</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>opera di persuasione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> finalizzata all’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>accoglibilità della propria istanza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, finisce con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’indurre la PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> competente ad una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>maggiore ponderazione predecisionale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 25 ottobre viene presentato in Senato il c.d. </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>disegno di legge Nicolais</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, (dal nome dell’allora </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Ministro per le riforme e le innovazioni nella PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">), che diviene </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Atto Senato n.1859</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e che prevede, tra le altre cose, una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcibilità del danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>indipendentemente</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i> dalla </i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>spettanza del beneficio</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i> derivante dal </i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>provvedimento richiesto</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”: la previsione sembra dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ammettere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la risarcibilità di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> c.d. “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>da mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 31 ottobre esce la sentenza della III sezione del Tar Campania n.10329 alla cui stregua – in tema di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>imputabilità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> delle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>cause del ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – la PA </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non può addurre</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giustificazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del proprio </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>obbligo di provvedere rimasto inadempiuto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (inerzia, silenzio) un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fatto interno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> alla propria </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>organizzazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, al punto da farlo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>assurgere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> addirittura a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>causa di forza maggiore</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ossia ad una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>vis maior cui resisti non potest</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in grado di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>far venire meno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il proprio </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dovere istituzionale di provvedere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sull’istanza del privato. D’altronde, prosegue il Tar, anche </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>secondo il diritto comune</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>causa non imputabile</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">” ex </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art.1218 c.c.</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> idonea come tale ad </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>esonerare il debitore</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità per inadempimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> deve intendersi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>quell’impedimento assolutamente imprevedibile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ed </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>estraneo alla sfera</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del debitore medesimo, e dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tale che egli non avrebbe potuto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in alcun modo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prevederlo e controllarlo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, mentre </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ogni altro evento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> tale da rendere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>più oneroso o difficoltoso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> l’adempimento </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non potrebbe</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, in ogni caso, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>esentare il debitore</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> medesimo da </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> facendo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>venir meno l’inadempimento colpevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2009</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 12 giugno esce la sentenza della I sezione del Tar Lombardia n.4005 che assume </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcibile il danno da mero ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> perpetrato dalla PA: si tratta di una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pronuncia importante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che viene pubblicata </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>qualche giorno prima</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del varo della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge n.69.09</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la quale, nel </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>novellare la legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> intoducendovi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’art.2.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, parrà (almeno secondo una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>parte della dottrina</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) ammettere ormai proprio il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento del danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> prodotto da un “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">” nell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>adozione di un provvedimento </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>ex parte publica</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, quand’anche </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sfavorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il privato istante e dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sganciato dalla spettanza del bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dal medesimo privato istante </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anelato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nel </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>bacino procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nel quale il ritardo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>si è consumato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 18 giugno viene varata </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>la legge n.69</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, recante disposizioni per lo sviluppo economico, la semplificazione, la competitivita' nonche' in materia di processo civile, il cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art.7, comma 1, lettera c)</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> inserisce nella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>articolo 2.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> rubricato “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>conseguenze per il </i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>ritardo dell'amministrazione</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i> nella conclusione del procedimento</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”, alla cui stregua (comma 1) le </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pubbliche amministrazioni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e i </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>soggetti di cui all'articolo 1, comma 1-ter</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, sono (</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>genericamente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e in modo, almeno all’apparenza, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>onnicomprensivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tenuti al risarcimento del danno ingiusto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> cagionato in </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conseguenza dell'inosservanza dolosa o colposa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine di conclusione del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e (comma 2) le </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pertinenti controversie</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sono attribuite alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giurisdizione esclusiva del giudice amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, con</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b> prescrizione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del pertinente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diritto al risarcimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del danno fissata in </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>5 anni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. La norma sembra prevedere la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcibilità anche</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del danno da “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”, prodottosi in conseguenza della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mancata adozione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nei termini di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento della PA quale che sia</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anche sfavorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il privato in termini di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concreta spettanza dell’anelato bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 31 agosto esce la sentenza della II sezione del Tar Puglia n.2031 onde, da una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prima lettura</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nuovo art.2.bis della legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, potrebbe pur affermarsi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non priva di fondamento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> una interpretazione della ridetta norma nel senso della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ormai ammissibile risarcibilità del c.d. danno da mero ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, come tale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sganciato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concreta spettanza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in capo al privato istante </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’utilità finale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> cui egli anela.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2010</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 2 luglio viene varato il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>decreto legislativo n.104</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, nuovo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>codice del processo amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art.30</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>supera</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la c.d. </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pregiudiziale amministrativa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sia con riguardo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>all’annullamento dell’atto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pregiudiziale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, appunto, rispetto alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>richiesta di risarcimento dei danni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> prodotti dall’atto stesso), sia con riguardo alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>illegittimità del “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>silenzio</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>” dell’Amministrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (rispetto alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>richiesta di risarcimento dei danni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> prodotti dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>ex parte publica</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che da quel “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>silenzio</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">” </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>è scaturito</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">). Importante anche </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’art.117</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che prevede un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rito speciale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> attivabile dal privato in caso di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>inerzia della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e, dunque, avverso il c.d. </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>silenzio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">: attraverso </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tale forma di tutela</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il privato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>può ottenere dalla PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> l’adozione di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento espresso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che, nondimeno, giunge </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>in ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> rispetto alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>scadenza del termine procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e che può dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dare la stura</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ad un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>da mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> laddove si tratti di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento (legittimo) sfavorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ovvero di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nel </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conseguimento del provvedimento favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (e del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>connesso bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che vi si riannette) laddove si tratti di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento (legittimo) favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, circostanza </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>quest’ultima</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che, a seconda delle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>opzioni abbracciate</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, può essere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>da sola sufficiente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per affermare una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ovvero può costituire </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il presupposto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>predicare tale responsabilità pubblica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, con il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concorso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>altri indefettibili elementi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> collegati alle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concrete ragioni del ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (che potrebbero essere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giustificate</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ovvero all’opposto costituire il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prodotto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dolo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> o di una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>colpa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da parte di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>chi ha agito per l’Amministrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">). L'</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art. 4, comma 1, n. 14)</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell'</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Allegato 4</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del codice </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>abroga poi il comma 2 dell'art. 2-bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, riaffermando la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giurisdizione esclusiva del GA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sui danni da ritardo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>all’art.133, comma 1, lettera a) n.1</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, che devolve appunto alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giurisdizione esclusiva del GA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> le controversie in materia di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento del danno ingiusto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> cagionato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>in conseguenza dell’inosservanza dolosa o colposa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine di conclusione del procedimento amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>senza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che tuttavia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’art.30</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del medesimo codice riproduca </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anche il termine di prescrizione quinquennale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>domanda di risarcimento dei danni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> cagionati dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, già previsto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dall’ormai integralmente abrogato art.2.bis, comma 2</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, della legge 241.90; piuttosto, il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>comma 3 del </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">ridetto</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b> art.30 c.p.a.</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> prevede che la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>domanda di risarcimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dei danni per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>lesione di interessi legittimi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è proposta </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>entro il termine di decadenza di 120 giorni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> decorrente dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giorno in cui il fatto si è verificato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ovvero dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conoscenza del provvedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> se il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno deriva direttamente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da questo, mentre </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>ex professo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>successivo comma 4</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> statuisce che per il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento dell’eventuale danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che il ricorrente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>comprovi di aver subito</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conseguenza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>inosservanza dolosa o colposa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine di conclusione del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine di cui al comma 3</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (e dunque il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine di 120 giorni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non decorre</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> fintanto che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>perduri l’inadempimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, iniziando piuttosto a decorrere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>solo dopo 1 anno dalla scadenza del termine</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>per provvedere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, onde </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>solo dopo 1 anno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da quando </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>è scaduto per la PA il termine procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> decorre il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine di 120 giorni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per far valere il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento dell’eventuale, comprovato danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da parte del privato.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2011</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 24 marzo esce la sentenza della V sezione del Consiglio di Stato n.1796 alla cui stregua la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>condanna della PA al risarcimento del danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> subito dal privato per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>omesso esercizio di un potere autoritativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nei </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termini prefissati dalla legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> presuppone il riconoscimento del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diritto del ricorrente al bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> inutilmente richiesto, e la relativa </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>valutazione sulla pertinente spettanza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, nelle materie in cui la PA dispone di una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ampia discrezionalità amministrativa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non solo tecnica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> può essere affidata </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ad un giudizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, necessariamente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prognostico</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, del GA, presupponendo piuttosto che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>la PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>riesercitato il potere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ad essa affidato, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>abbia riconosciuto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al privato il bene della vita medesimo; onde atteso che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>per poter accedere alla risarcibilità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la lesione </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>deve incidere sul bene della vita finale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che funge da </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sostrato materiale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interesse legittimo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è possibile configurare una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tutela risarcitoria degli interessi c.d. procedimentali puri</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, delle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mere aspettative</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> o dei </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardi procedimentali</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> fatta salva l’applicazione, quando del caso, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’art.2.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 15 dicembre esce la sentenza del IV sezione del Consiglio di Stato n. 6609 che, inserendosi nel solco dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>orientamento maggioritario</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nega</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la configurabilità nel sistema (anche </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dopo l’avvento dell’art.2.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) di un danno c.d. “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>da mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”, che prescinda dunque dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concreta spettanza del bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in capo al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ed interlocutore procedimentale della PA.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2012</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 23 febbraio esce la sentenza della VI sezione del Consiglio di Stato n.1015 alla cui stregua, in caso di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che veda </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>coinvolte diverse Pubbliche Amministrazioni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> può </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ricomprendere anche gli effetti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (pregiudizievoli) che il ritardo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>abbia prodotto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sull’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>esito di procedimenti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che siano </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>collegati</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> a quello in cui esso </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>è specificamente maturato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">*Il 9 marzo esce la sentenza del Tar Umbria n.80 che, inserendosi nel solco dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>orientamento maggioritario</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nega</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la configurabilità nel sistema (anche </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dopo l’avvento dell’art.2.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) di un danno c.d. “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>da mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”, che prescinda dunque dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concreta spettanza del bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in capo al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ed interlocutore procedimentale della PA.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 14 maggio esce la sentenza della I sezione del Tar Calabria n.450 onde, laddove </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>manchi una pronuncia della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, seppure </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tardiva</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, di natura </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>positiva o negativa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il privato istante, il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giudizio prognostico sul bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e, per conseguenza, sull’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>entità del danno lamentato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dal privato che abbia agito per ottenere il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento del danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, diventa </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>particolarmente complessa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in fattispecie di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>attività discrezionale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; in tal caso infatti </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il GA deve valutare gli elementi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che, in base ad una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>semplice ed evidente presunzione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, con una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mera operazione probabilistica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, avrebbero condotto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>all’assunzione di un provvedimento favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> se la PA </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>avesse rispettato il termine</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> o se </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>si fosse comunque determinata</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>evitando</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> tuttavia di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sconfinare</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in considerazioni di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>opportunità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (riservate come tali </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>alla PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> medesima).</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 22 giugno viene varato il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>decreto legge n. 83</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, recante misure urgenti per la crescita del Paese, il cui art.18, comma 5, prescrive – in tema di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concessione di benefici economici</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – che a decorrere dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>1° gennaio 2013</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, per le concessioni di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>vantaggi economici successivi all'entrata in vigore</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del decreto-legge ridetto, la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pubblicazione</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>via internet</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ai sensi appunto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’art. 18</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (c.d. </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>amministrazione aperta</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) costituisce </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>condizione legale di efficacia</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>titolo legittimante</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concessioni ed attribuzioni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>importo complessivo superiore a mille euro</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nel corso </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell'anno solare</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, siccome previste dal comma 1, la relativa </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>eventuale omissione o incompletezza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dovendo essere rilevata </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>d'ufficio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dagli </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>organi dirigenziali</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>di controllo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, sotto la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>propria diretta responsabilità amministrativa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>patrimoniale e contabile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l'indebita concessione o attribuzione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del beneficio economico. La </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mancata, incompleta o ritardata pubblicazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e' altresì rilevabile </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dal destinatario della prevista concessione o attribuzione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e da </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>chiunque altro vi abbia interesse</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, anche </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ai fini</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento del danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da parte dell'</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Amministrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ai sensi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell'articolo 30 del codice del processo amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di cui al decreto legislativo 2 luglio 2010, n. 104. </span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 7 agosto viene varata la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge n.134</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>converte in legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, con modificazioni, il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>decreto legge n.83.</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2013</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 26 febbraio esce la sentenza del Tar Basilicata n.83, alla cui stregua, onde ammettere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>configurabile la responsabilità della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e la conseguente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>insorgenza di un pregiudizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, anche la valutazione </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’elemento soggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> non può essere affidata al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>semplice dato obiettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con il quale il provvedimento finale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>è stato adottato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e dunque al solo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procrastinarsi del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> oltre il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine fissato dalla legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dovendo essere piuttosto dimostrato che la PA abbia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>agito con dolo o colpa grave</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 7 marzo esce la sentenza della IV sezione del Consiglio di Stato n.1406, alla cui stregua – secondo l’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>orientamento minoritario</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – va affermato che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’art.2.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (siccome introdotto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nel 2009</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) presuppone </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anche il tempo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> essere un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il cittadino, dovendosi dunque assumere sulla base di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tale disposizione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo nella conclusione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in un procedimento configura un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>costo sempre e in ogni caso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dal momento che il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fattore tempo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> costituisce una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>essenziale variabile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>predisposizione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e nell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>attuazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dei </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>piani finanziari</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> relativi a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>qualsiasi intervento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, condizionandone la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>relativa convenienza economica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Da ciò discende che il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conclusione del procedimento amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ed il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mancato rispetto di tempi certi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nella gestione della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sequenza procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> configurano (potenzialmente) un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>ingiusto</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> atteggiandosi, sul crinale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>economico</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ad </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>illegittimo “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>costo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che incide sulle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prospettive</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, le </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>aspettative</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e le </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>scelte</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> degli interlocutori privati, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>condizionandone la vita e l’attività</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ed incidendo negativamente sulla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>convenienza economica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> delle scelte </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>ab ovo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b> divisate</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; ciò tanto laddove </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il bene preteso dal privato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> risulti </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>alfine dovuto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, quanto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anche</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nel caso in cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risulti alfine negato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, sol che si consideri come </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’incertezza sull’esito procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che si protragga </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>oltre i confini previsti dalla legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per la relativa conclusione è </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>idonea ad impedire</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, o comunque a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rendere più complessa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>predisposizione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>programmi o scelte</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> diverse o alternative.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 14 marzo viene varato il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>decreto legislativo n.33</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, recante </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>riordino della disciplina</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> riguardante gli </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>obblighi di pubblicità, trasparenza e diffusione di informazioni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da parte delle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>PPAA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art.53, comma 1, lettera t)</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> abroga </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’art.18</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>decreto legge n.83 del 2012</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ribadendo tuttavia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>contestualmente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> all’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art.26, comma 3</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, che – in tema di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concessione di benefici economici</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pubblicazione</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>via internet</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ai sensi appunto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’art. 26 </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">(</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>obblighi di pubblicazione</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i> degli atti di </i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>concessione di sovvenzioni, contributi, sussidi e</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i> attribuzione di </i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>vantaggi economici</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i> a persone fisiche ed enti pubblici e privati</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) costituisce </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>condizione legale di efficacia</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>titolo legittimante</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concessioni ed attribuzioni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>importo complessivo superiore a mille euro</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nel corso </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell'anno solare</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> previste dal comma 1, la relativa </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>eventuale omissione o incompletezza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dovendo essere rilevata </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>d'ufficio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dagli </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>organi dirigenziali</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>di controllo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, sotto la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>propria diretta responsabilità amministrativa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>patrimoniale e contabile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l'indebita concessione o attribuzione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del beneficio economico. La </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mancata, incompleta o ritardata pubblicazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e' altresì rilevabile </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dal destinatario della prevista concessione o attribuzione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e da </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>chiunque altro abbia interesse</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, anche </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ai fini</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento del danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da parte dell'</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Amministrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ai sensi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell'articolo 30 del codice del processo amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di cui al decreto legislativo 2 luglio 2010, n. 104. </span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 21 giugno viene varato il decreto legge n.69, il cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>articolo 28, comma 9</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, aggiunge un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>comma 1.bis </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">all’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art. 2.bis della legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> alla cui stregua, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fatto salvo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> quanto previsto dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>comma 1</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ad esclusione delle ipotesi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>silenzio qualificato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e dei </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concorsi pubblici</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, in caso di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>inosservanza del termine di conclusione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del procedimento </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ad istanza di parte</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, per il quale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sussiste l'obbligo di pronunziarsi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, l'istante ha </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diritto di ottenere un indennizzo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mero ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> alle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>condizioni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e con le </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>modalità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> stabilite dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> o, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sulla base della legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, da un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>regolamento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> emanato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ai sensi dell'articolo 17, comma 2</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, della legge 23 agosto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>1988, n. 400, </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">in tal caso le </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>somme corrisposte o da corrispondere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> a titolo di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>indennizzo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dovendo essere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>detratte</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dall’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>eventuale risarcimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Il successivo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>comma 10</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>articolo 28</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del decreto legge in parola prevede tuttavia – quanto a concreto ambito applicativo - che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ogni disposizione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del ridetto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>articolo 28</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (e dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anche il comma 9</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sul </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da mero ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) si applica, in via </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sperimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dalla data di entrata in vigore della legge di conversione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del decreto medesimo, ai </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procedimenti amministrativi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> relativi all'</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>avvio e all'esercizio dell'attività di impresa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> iniziati </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>successivamente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> alla detta </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>data di entrata in vigore</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Stando al successivo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>comma 12</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, decorsi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>18 mesi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dall'</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>entrata in vigore della legge di conversione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del decreto e sulla base del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>monitoraggio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> relativo alla relativa </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>applicazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>regolamento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> emanato ai sensi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell'articolo 17, comma 2, della legge 23 agosto 1988, n. 400</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, su </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>proposta</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Ministro per la pubblica amministrazione e la semplificazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concerto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Ministro dell'economia e delle finanze</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, viene stabilita la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conferma</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rimodulazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, anche con riguardo ai </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procedimenti amministrativi esclusi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, o la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>cessazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> delle disposizioni del medesimo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>articolo 28</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, nonché eventualmente il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine a decorrere dal quale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> le disposizioni ivi contenute </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sono applicate</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anche gradualmente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ai </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procedimenti amministrativi diversi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da quelli individuati al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>comma 10</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Poiché la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nuova disposizione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> fa riferimento al “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”, il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>correlato indennizzo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> viene corrisposto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>a prescindere dall’esistenza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pregiudizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, palesandosi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>preordinato a compensare</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> appunto il (solo) </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mero ritardo della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, assunto come </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>comportamento omissivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e tuttavia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non illecito</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nel contesto di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>bacino procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è ormai </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>spirato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Secondo il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nuovo assetto normativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>comma 1 dell’art.2.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> fa riferimento </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>expressis verbis</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno ingiusto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> cagionato in </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conseguenza della inosservanza dolosa o colposa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine di conclusione del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, onde il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno eventualmente inferto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al privato istante assume tale ritardo come </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>indefettibile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e specifico </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>presupposto causale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, mentre il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>successivo comma 1.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> si applica </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>indipendentemente dalla causazione di un danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, per effetto del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>semplice ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (assunto come </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>atto lecito dannoso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della PA), con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>scomputo dell’eventuale indennizzo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (già percepito) dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>posta risarcitoria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> laddove il privato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>agisca (anche) a titolo risarcitorio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nei confronti della PA cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> vada per avventura addebitato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>a titolo di illecito</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Dal punto di vista </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>quantitativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il privato istante </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>può chiedere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> a titolo di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>indennizzo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">” una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>somma pari a 30 Euro</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ogni giorno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, per l’appunto, di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mero ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, per un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>totale comunque non superiore a 2000 Euro complessivi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, a decorrere dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giorno di scadenza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; in termini </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procedurali </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">(comma 2), al fine di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ottenere l'indennizzo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, l'istante </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>e' tenuto ad azionare</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>potere sostitutivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> previsto dall'art. </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2, comma 9-bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge n. 241 del 1990</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nel </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine decadenziale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>7 giorni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>scadenza del termine di conclusione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del procedimento, in tal caso i </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>soggetti privati che esercitano pubblici</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> poteri di cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>all'articolo 1, comma 1-ter</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, della medesima legge essendo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tenuti all’uopo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ad individuare il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabile del potere sostitutivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Stando al successivo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>comma 3</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, (solo) nel caso in cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anche il titolare del potere sostitutivo non adotti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il divisato provvedimento nel termine o </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non liquidi l'indennizzo maturato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> a tale data, l'istante </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>può proporre ricorso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ai sensi dell'</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>articolo 117</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del codice del processo amministrativo (ricorso avverso il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>silenzio della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) oppure, ricorrendone i </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>presupposti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dell'articolo 118 dello stesso codice (ricorso per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>decreto ingiuntivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, al fine di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>vedersi liquidato l’indennizzo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">); peraltro (comma 4) nel </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giudizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>all'articolo 117</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> c.p.a. (avverso il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>silenzio della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">), l’istante privato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>può proporre</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> - </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>congiuntamente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al ricorso </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>avverso il silenzio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> - domanda per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ottenere l'indennizzo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ed in tal caso </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anche tale domanda</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e' trattata </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>con rito camerale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e decisa con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sentenza in forma semplificata</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Ai sensi del successivo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>comma 6</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, se il ricorso </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>e' dichiarato inammissibile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> o </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>e' respinto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in relazione all'</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>inammissibilità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> o alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>manifesta infondatezza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell'istanza che ha </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dato avvio al procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il giudice, con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pronuncia immediatamente esecutiva</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, condanna il ricorrente a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pagare in favore del resistente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (la PA) una somma </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>da 2 volte a 4 volte</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il contributo unificato, disposizione intesa a scongiurare </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>liti temerarie</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Ai sensi dei </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>successivi comma 7 e 8</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, mentre </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>ex post</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la pronuncia di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>condanna a carico dell'amministrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e' comunicata, a cura della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Segreteria del giudice che l'ha pronunciata</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Corte dei Conti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al fine del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>controllo di gestione sulla pubblica amministrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Procuratore regionale della Corte dei Conti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per le valutazioni di competenza, nonché al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>titolare dell'azione disciplinare verso i dipendenti pubblici</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> interessati dal procedimento amministrativo (ancorché </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non si tratti di sentenza in giudicato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anche nel caso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>semplice sentenza di primo grado soggetta ad appello</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, a differenza di quanto accade nelle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fattispecie</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ricorso avverso il silenzio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della PA </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>senza richiesta di indennizzo per ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, che devono essere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>trasmesse telematicamente alla Corte dei Conti</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>solo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> se </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>in giudicato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ex </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art.2, comma 8</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, della legge 241.90, siccome </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>novellato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>decreto legge n.5.12</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">); </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>ex ante</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, nella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>comunicazione di avvio del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e nelle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>informazioni sul procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> pubblicate </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ai sensi dell'articolo 35</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del decreto legislativo 14 marzo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2013, n. 33</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e' </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fatta menzione del diritto all'indennizzo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, nonché </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>delle modalità e dei termini</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conseguirlo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ed e' altresì indicato il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>soggetto cui e' attribuito il potere sostitutivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e i </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termini a questo assegnati</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per la conclusione del procedimento. Quello stesso giorno esce la sentenza della V sezione del Consiglio di Stato n.3405, alla cui stregua, onde ammettere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>configurabile la responsabilità della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e la conseguente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>insorgenza di un pregiudizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, anche la valutazione </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’elemento soggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> non può essere affidata al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>semplice dato obiettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con il quale il provvedimento finale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>è stato adottato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e dunque al solo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procrastinarsi del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> oltre il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine fissato dalla legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dovendo essere piuttosto dimostrato che la PA abbia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>agito con dolo o colpa grave</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 9 agosto viene varata la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge n.98</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>converte in legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, con modificazioni, il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>decreto legge n.69</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. La legge </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>novella l’art.28</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del decreto legge ridetto disciplinando la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>richiesta di indennizzo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nel </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>particolare caso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in cui al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procedimento del cui ritardo si tratta</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> intervengano </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>più Amministrazioni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Inoltre, per il privato istante il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine perentorio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>azionare il potere sostitutivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pregiudiziale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al fine di adire il GA per ottenerne la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pertinente tutela</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, viene </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>elevato da 7 a 20 giorni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">*Il 21 agosto esce la sentenza della IV sezione del Consiglio di Stato n.4228, alla cui stregua, onde ammettere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>configurabile la responsabilità della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e la conseguente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>insorgenza di un pregiudizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, anche la valutazione </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’elemento soggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> non può essere affidata al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>semplice dato obiettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con il quale il provvedimento finale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>è stato adottato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e dunque al solo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procrastinarsi del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> oltre il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine fissato dalla legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dovendo essere piuttosto dimostrato che la PA abbia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>agito con dolo o colpa grave</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">*Il 4 settembre esce la sentenza del IV sezione del Consiglio di Stato n. 4452 che, inserendosi nel solco dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>orientamento maggioritario</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nega</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la configurabilità nel sistema (anche </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dopo l’avvento dell’art.2.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) di un danno c.d. “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>da mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”, che prescinda dunque dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concreta spettanza del bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in capo al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ed interlocutore procedimentale della PA. Peraltro, onde ammettere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>configurabile la responsabilità della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e la conseguente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>insorgenza di un pregiudizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, anche la valutazione </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’elemento soggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> non può essere affidata al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>semplice dato obiettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con il quale il provvedimento finale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>è stato adottato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e dunque al solo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procrastinarsi del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> oltre il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine fissato dalla legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dovendo essere piuttosto dimostrato che la PA abbia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>agito con dolo o colpa grave</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2014</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 9 gennaio viene varata la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Direttiva</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Dipartimento della Funzione pubblica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dettante </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>linee guida</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per l’applicazione dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>indennizzo da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conclusione dei procedimenti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ad </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>istanza di parte</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. In quella medesima data viene varata anche la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Direttiva</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Ministro per la Pubblica Amministrazione e la Semplificazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> recante, del pari, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>linee guida</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sull’applicazione </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’art. 28 del <a href="http://www.lexitalia.it/p/13/2013-69.htm">D.L. n. 69 del 2013</a></b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, nella parte in cui ha introdotto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’indennizzo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conclusione dei procedimenti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ad </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>istanza di parte</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 31 gennaio esce la sentenza della III sezione del Consiglio di Stato n.468 alla cui stregua l</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fattispecie risarcitoria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nel provvedere da parte della P.A. trova </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>specifica disciplina</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art 2 bis della </b></span><a href="http://www.lexitalia.it/uploads1/webdata_pro.pl?_cgifunction=form&_layout=legislazione1&keyval=legislazione.legislazione_id=1015"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge n. 241 del 1990</b></span></a><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, a tenor del quale le </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pubbliche amministrazioni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e i </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>soggetti di cui all’art. 1, comma 1 ter</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della legge medesima, sono </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tenuti al risarcimento del danno ingiusto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> cagionato dall’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>inosservanza dolosa o colposa del termine di conclusione del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; si tratta per il Collegio di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>disposizione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tutela in sé il bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> inerente alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>certezza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, quanto al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fattore tempo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dei </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rapporti giuridici</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che vedono </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>come parte la P.A</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">., stante la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ricaduta</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che il ritardo a provvedere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>può avere sullo svolgimento di attività ed iniziative economiche</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> condizionate alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>valutazione positiva della P.A.,</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ovvero alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rimozione di limiti di rilievo pubblico</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al relativo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>espletamento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di tale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> riceve </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>qualificazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, sul piano </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>oggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dall’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>inosservanza del termine ordinamentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conclusione del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; sul crinale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>soggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il ritardo deve essere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ascrivibile ad un’inosservanza dolosa o colposa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dei </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termini di legge o di regolamento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> stabiliti per l’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>adozione dell’atto terminale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del pertinente procedimento. Per il Collegio </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non può</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> tuttavia essere riconosciuto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>un danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nel </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rilascio di una autorizzazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (nella specie, una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>autorizzazione regionale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> all’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>attivazione di un ambulatorio PET-TAC</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, negata) nel caso in cui: a) il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diniego di rilascio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sia giustificato dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>succedersi nel tempo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diverse normative generali</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sul </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>piano programmatorio e pianificatorio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, di guisa che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non emergono gli estremi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>condotta colpevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell’Amministrazione competente ed il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> derivi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dall’esito del giudizio di primo grado</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, conforme alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>scelta provvedimentale dell’Amministrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>segno negativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, come tale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>impeditivo di ogni determinazione favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sulla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>domanda della ditta ricorrente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> fino alla definizione del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giudizio di appello</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; b) </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> vi sia stata, a seguito della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sentenza di appello</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di accoglimento del ricorso, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>violazione del termine a provvedere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rilascio del titolo autorizzatorio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 28 febbraio esce la sentenza della III sezione del Consiglio di Stato n.943, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">che assume </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>confortabile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>domanda di risarcimento del danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il fatto che il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento di aggiudicazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di una gara sia intervenuto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>a distanza di tempo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (nella specie, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dopo 1 anno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) dall’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>avvio del pertinente procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ove ciò sia dipeso dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>stazione appaltante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, essendo decorso </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>un lasso di tempo giustificato solo in parte</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ricerca di una soluzione più economica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Nel caso di specie, in applicazione dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art. 28, comma 1</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, della <a href="http://www.lexitalia.it/n/2529.htm">L. 9 agosto </a></span><a href="http://www.lexitalia.it/n/2529.htm"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2013, n. 98</b></span></a><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il Collegio assume come </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’indennizzo per il mero ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – pari ad una somma di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>30 euro</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ogni giorno di ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non possa comunque complessivamente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> essere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>superiore a 2.000 euro</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 2 aprile esce la sentenza della III sezione del Tar Lazio n.3643, alla cui stregua il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, quale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pregiudizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> derivante dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mancato esercizio nei termini di legge di un determinato potere autoritativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, implica </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>lesione di interessi legittimi pretensivi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, la cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>cognizione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> deve intendersi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>affidata alla giurisdizione esclusiva del GA.</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">*Il 30 aprile esce la sentenza della III sezione del Consiglio di Stato n.2279, alla cui stregua – secondo l’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>orientamento minoritario</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – va affermato che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’art.2.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (siccome introdotto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nel 2009</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) presuppone </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anche il tempo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> essere un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il cittadino, dovendosi dunque assumere sulla base di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tale disposizione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo nella conclusione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in un procedimento configura un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>costo sempre e in ogni caso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dal momento che il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fattore tempo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> costituisce una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>essenziale variabile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>predisposizione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e nell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>attuazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dei </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>piani finanziari</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> relativi a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>qualsiasi intervento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, condizionandone la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>relativa convenienza economica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Da ciò discende che il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conclusione del procedimento amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ed il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mancato rispetto di tempi certi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nella gestione della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sequenza procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> configurano (potenzialmente) un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>ingiusto</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> atteggiandosi, sul crinale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>economico</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ad </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>illegittimo “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>costo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che incide sulle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prospettive</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, le </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>aspettative</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e le </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>scelte</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> degli interlocutori privati, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>condizionandone la vita e l’attività</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ed incidendo negativamente sulla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>convenienza economica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> delle scelte </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>ab ovo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b> divisate</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; ciò tanto laddove </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il bene preteso dal privato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> risulti </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>alfine dovuto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, quanto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anche</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nel caso in cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risulti alfine negato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, sol che si consideri come </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’incertezza sull’esito procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che si protragga </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>oltre i confini previsti dalla legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per la relativa conclusione è </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>idonea ad impedire</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, o comunque a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rendere più complessa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>predisposizione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>programmi o scelte</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> diverse o alternative.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 22 maggio esce la sentenza della IV sezione del Consiglio di Stato n.2638 alla cui stregua </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’introduzione nel 2013</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>indennizzo per mero ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di cui all’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art.2 bis, comma 1.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ha confermato la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>natura strettamente risarcitoria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> previsto dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>precedente comma 1</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, che dunque – quale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>illecito</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> - </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>copre</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da mero ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, riconducibile ad un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>atto lecito dannoso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e ristorabile ormai </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giusta indennizzo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ai sensi del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>comma 1.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">*Il 10 giugno esce la sentenza della IV sezione del Consiglio di Stato n.2964, alla cui stregua il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, quale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pregiudizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> derivante dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mancato esercizio nei termini di legge di un determinato potere autoritativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, implica </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>lesione di interessi legittimi pretensivi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, la cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>cognizione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> deve intendersi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>affidata alla giurisdizione esclusiva del GA.</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> Sul crinale sostanziale poi, inserendosi nel solco dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>orientamento maggioritario</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il Collegio </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nega</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la configurabilità nel sistema (anche </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dopo l’avvento dell’art.2.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) di un danno c.d. “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>da mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”, che prescinda dunque dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concreta spettanza del bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in capo al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ed interlocutore procedimentale della PA.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 30 dicembre esce la sentenza della II sezione del Tar Puglia, n.1703, secondo la quale a</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">lla categoria del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in cui è incorsa la P.A. </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nell’esercizio dell’attività amministrativa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e, in particolare, nel </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rilascio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, possono essere ricondotte sostanzialmente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>3 ipotesi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ovvero: 1) l’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>adozione tardiva</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento legittimo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ma </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sfavorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il privato interessato; 2) l’adozione </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tardiva</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un provvedimento (legittimo) </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; 3) la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mera inerzia</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ossia la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mancata adozione </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>tout court</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del provvedimento divisato. Fatta questa premessa sistematica, per il Tar va assunta confortabile la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>domanda di risarcimento del danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> avanzata nei confronti di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Comune</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>società</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> operante nel settore degli </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>impianti pubblicitari</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> allorché l’Ente locale – in disparte la circostanza che non </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ha ancora adottato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Nuovo Piano Generale degli Impianti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> –</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">abbia comunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>omesso di esaminare</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tempestivamente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> numerose </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>domande</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> presentate dalla società stessa di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>autorizzazione all’installazione degli impianti pubblicitari</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nel territorio comunale e </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non abbia terminato la relativa istruttoria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nei </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termini di legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rilasciando</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> le relative autorizzazioni con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>grave ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> rispetto alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>data di presentazione della domanda</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e soltanto a seguito di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>due ordinanze cautelari del G.A.</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>apposita nomina del commissario </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>ad acta,</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in tal caso la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>domanda risarcitoria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dovendosi assumere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fondata</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> atteso come, per un verso, con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’avvenuto rilascio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> delle autorizzazioni da parte del commissario </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>ad acta</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sia stato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>inconfutabilmente ritenuto spettante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> alla società interessata il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>bene della vita effettivamente anelato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e per l’altro, come sussista la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>violazione dei fondamentali principi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> cui deve essere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conformata l’attività amministrativa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>ex</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art. 97 Cost.</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (quali </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’imparzialità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il buon andamento,</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> oltre che dei pertinenti </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>corollari</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>economicità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>speditezza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>efficienza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>buona fede</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tutela dell’affidamento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">); tale illegittima condotta non può – per il Tar - che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ascriversi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, quanto meno, a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>grave negligenza o imperizia</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> degli </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>uffici dell’Amministrazione comunale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> complessivamente considerati (e dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>all’Ente locale come apparato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">).</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2015</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 12 gennaio esce la sentenza della I sezione del Tar Lombardia n.94 alla cui stregua va </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>riconosciuta</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la configurabilità del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>mero</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ex </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art. 2.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (siccome introdotto nel </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2009</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">), dovendo essere valorizzato il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fattore “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>tempo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> come </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>bene autonomo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ed essendosi peraltro al cospetto di una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fattispecie</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità c.d. “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>contrattuale</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della PA.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 5 febbraio esce la sentenza della III sezione del Tar Lazio n.2142 alla cui stregua </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’introduzione nel 2013</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>indennizzo per mero ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di cui all’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art.2 bis, comma 1.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ha confermato la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>natura strettamente risarcitoria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> previsto dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>precedente comma 1</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, che dunque – quale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>illecito</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> - </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>copre</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da mero ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, riconducibile ad un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>atto lecito dannoso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e ristorabile ormai </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giusta indennizzo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ai sensi del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>comma 1.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Per il Tar l’art.2.bis </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>espressamente ammette al risarcimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>solo danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> qualificato come “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>ingiusto</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”, ovvero quello che si verifica allorché </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>la dolosa o colposa inerzia</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della PA – ed il conseguente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> - pregiudichi un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interesse sostanziale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>effettiva pertinenza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del privato, connesso dunque alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>spettanza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del pertinente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">*Il 14 aprile esce la sentenza della II sezione del Tar Campania, Salerno, n.811 alla cui stregua </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’introduzione nel 2013</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>indennizzo per mero ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di cui all’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art.2 bis, comma 1.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ha confermato la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>natura strettamente risarcitoria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> previsto dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>precedente comma 1</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, che dunque – quale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>illecito</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> - </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>copre</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da mero ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, riconducibile ad un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>atto lecito dannoso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e ristorabile ormai </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giusta indennizzo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ai sensi del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>comma 1.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">*Il 13 maggio esce la sentenza della III sezione del Consiglio di Stato n.2410, alla cui stregua, onde ammettere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>configurabile la responsabilità della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e la conseguente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>insorgenza di un pregiudizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, anche la valutazione </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’elemento soggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> non può essere affidata al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>semplice dato obiettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con il quale il provvedimento finale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>è stato adottato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e dunque al solo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procrastinarsi del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> oltre il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine fissato dalla legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dovendo essere piuttosto dimostrato che la PA abbia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>agito con dolo o colpa grave</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">*Il 17 giugno esce la sentenza della V sezione del Consiglio di Stato n.3047, alla cui stregua, onde ammettere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>configurabile la responsabilità della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e la conseguente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>insorgenza di un pregiudizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, anche la valutazione </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’elemento soggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> non può essere affidata al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>semplice dato obiettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con il quale il provvedimento finale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>è stato adottato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e dunque al solo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procrastinarsi del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> oltre il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine fissato dalla legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dovendo essere piuttosto dimostrato che la PA abbia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>agito con dolo o colpa grave</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 10 luglio esce la sentenza della III sezione del Tar Sicilia n.1687 alla cui stregua occorre muovere dal presupposto che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>va negato il risarcimento del danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> laddove difetti la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prova concreta di tutti i relativi presupposti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, tra i quali vanno in primo luogo annoverate le </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>condizioni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concreta adozione dei provvedimenti omessi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, oltre che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’ammontare del preteso danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (tanta a titolo di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno emergente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>lucro cessante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, giusta produzione di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fatture quietanzate</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conteggi comparativi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e così via), ed infine di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>preciso nesso causale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> tra </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo e danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Con riguardo a quest’ultimo elemento (</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prova del nesso causale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">), il Collegio </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nega tutela risarcitoria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>vincitore di un concorso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> laddove, a procedura </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conclusa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, sia stato poi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>annullato il bando</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> perché fondato su </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>disposizione normativa non più applicabile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (e dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>emanato in ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">): per il Tar in simili fattispecie va assunto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>insussistente il nesso causale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> tra </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno lagnato dal ricorrente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e ciò alla stregua del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>principio di c.d. “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>regolarità causale</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> onde devono assumersi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcibili i soli danni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che costituiscano </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conseguenze normalmente prevedibili</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fatto illecito</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (o dell’inadempimento).</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 20 novembre esce la sentenza della II sezione del Tar Liguria n. 933 che, inserendosi nel solco dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>orientamento maggioritario</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nega</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la configurabilità nel sistema (anche </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dopo l’avvento dell’art.2.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) di un danno c.d. “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>da mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”, che prescinda dunque dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concreta spettanza del bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in capo al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ed interlocutore procedimentale della PA. Per il Collegio il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rilascio del provvedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> oltre il termine finale procedimentale (e dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>in ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) causa al destinatario un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno risarcibile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> solo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>subordinatamente al fatto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che tale danno </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sia provato nell’</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>an</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b> e nel </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>quantum</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e che il ritardo sia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>imputabile alla PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> quanto meno a titolo di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>colpa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2016</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">L’8 gennaio esce la sentenza della II sezione del Tar Liguria n.4 alla cui stregua il risarcimento dei </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danni per il ritardo dell’Amministrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nell’adozione di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento dovuto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> - come evidenziato dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">giurisprudenza - può essere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>richiesto esclusivamente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nelle ipotesi in cui sia stato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>previamente accertato e dichiarato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dal Giudice il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>silenzio inadempimento dell'amministrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (TAR Sicilia Palermo III 5 giugno 2015 n. 1316). E’ stato altresì affermato, rammenta il Tar, che in tema di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>presupposti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento del danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, al fine del necessario </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>accertamento della colposità dell'inerzia</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dimostrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> incombe sul </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danneggiato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, non è sufficiente la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sola violazione del termine massimo di durata</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del procedimento amministrativo, poiché tale violazione </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>di per sé non dimostra l'imputabilità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, potendo la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>particolare complessità della fattispecie</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> o il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sopraggiungere di evenienze non imputabili all'amministrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> escludere la sussistenza della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>colpa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Il comportamento dell'Amministrazione, inoltre, deve essere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>valutato unitamente alla condotta dell'istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il quale riveste il ruolo di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>parte essenziale e attiva</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e in tale veste dispone di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>poteri idonei a incidere sulla tempistica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e sull'</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>esito</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del procedimento stesso, attraverso il ricorso ai </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rimedi amministrativi e giustiziali</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> riconosciutigli dall'ordinamento giuridico, tra cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il rito del silenzio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che deve essere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>attivato con tempestività</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> rilevando </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>altrimenti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ai fini </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell'art. 1227 c.c.</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (art. </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>30</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> c.p.a.) in ordine all'accertamento della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>spettanza del risarcimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nonché alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>quantificazione del danno risarcibile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (TAR Sicilia Palermo II 26 maggio 2015 n. 1243). In sostanza, per il Tar la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>previsione di cui all’art. 30 c.p.a.</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (con particolare riguardo al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concorso colposo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>privato “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>creditore</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del provvedimento) deve ritenersi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>valevole anche</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della pubblica amministrazione; ne consegue che per ottenere il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento del danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> occorre una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>iniziativa del danneggiato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> volta a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fare risaltare l’inerzia dell’amministrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Tale ordine di idee è </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conforme ai principi solidaristici</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che informano </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’ordinamento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e che impongono di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>attivarsi nel limite di un apprezzabile sacrificio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al fine di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>evitare</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>situazione produttiva del danno si aggravi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>passare del tempo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Detto in altre parole, per il Tar </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non è lecito</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’asserito danneggiato rimanga inerte</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per poi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giovarsi dell’inerzia della p.a.</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fini risarcitori</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, occorrendo piuttosto, affinché </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il danno possa essere risarcibile,</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> un’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>iniziativa del danneggiato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>metta in mora l’amministrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e ciò soprattutto quando, come nel caso di specie, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>faccia difetto una espressa previsione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine finale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 22 marzo esce la sentenza della III sezione della Cassazione n.5621, onde – in caso di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>domanda di risarcimento dei danni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tardivo rilascio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>autorizzazione amministrativa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, rilascio erogato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dopo l’annullamento di un provvedimento di diniego</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> intervenuto a distanza di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anni dall’originaria istanza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – seppure la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prova del dolo o della colpa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della PA, della quale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>è onerato il danneggiato,</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> non possa desumersi dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sola illegittimità del provvedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, positivo o negativo, concretamente rilasciato, non possono nondimeno essere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>assunti sufficienti ad escludere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la configurabilità </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’elemento soggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – quanto meno a titolo di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità colposa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – né </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’avvenuto annullamento di atti regolamentari generali</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dello stesso ente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>disciplinanti la materia</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> oggetto dell’autorizzazione, atteso l’obbligo della PA di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>organizzare la propria attività</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per assicurare il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tempestivo esame delle legittime aspettative</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dei privati, né la sussistenza di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>controverso elemento impeditivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al rilascio dell’autorizzazione, ove il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diniego</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, fondato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>esclusivamente su quest’ultimo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, sia stato giudicato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>illegittimo dal GA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Per la Corte va dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>cassata con rinvio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> una decisione che abbia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>riconosciuto giustificabile un ritardo di 17 anni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nell’adozione di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento di autorizzazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> all’apertura di una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>autoscuola</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> a causa di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>precedenti dinieghi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, poi dichiarati </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>illegittimi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, motivati da un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>precedente penale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del privato istante, che aveva fatto assumere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>insussistente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il requisito della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>buona condotta</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 23 marzo esce la sentenza della II sezione del Tar Puglia-Lecce, n.549, onde a</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">lla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>categoria concettuale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo della P.A.</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (che trova oggi un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>addentellato normativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nell’art. </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2 </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>bis</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><a href="http://www.lexitalia.it/n/1015"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge n. 241 del 1990</b></span></a><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>)</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sono riconducibili </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>3 distinte ipotesi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">: a) l’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>adozione tardiva</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento legittimo</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sfavorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il privato interessato; b) l’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>adozione tardiva</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento legittimo favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il privato interessato; c) la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mera inerzia</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e cioè la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mancata adozione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del provvedimento in parola. Tanto premesso, e scendendo alla fattispecie sottoposta al relativo vaglio, il Tar </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>accoglie</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la domanda di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento del danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> spiccata nei confronti della P.A. e scaturigine del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con il quale un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Comune</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ha </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dapprima immotivatamente sospeso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e successivamente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>portato a termine</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>grave ed ingiustificato ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (5 anni dall’avvio) – quantunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>con esito favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procedimento amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> avente ad oggetto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>una istanza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> presentata dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>proprietario di un terreno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e tendente ad ottenere il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rilascio del permesso di costruire</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per la realizzazione di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>impianto di distribuzione carburanti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con annesso </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>punto di ristoro</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">IL 25 marzo esce la sentenza della V sezione del Consiglio di Stato n. 1239 alla cui stregua anche se i </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termini per la conclusione del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>valutazione di impatto ambientale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (VIA) di cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>all’art. 20</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><a href="http://www.lexitalia.it/n/1244"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>d.lgs. n. 152 del 2006</b></span></a><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (codice dell’ambiente) </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non hanno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> natura di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termini perentori</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, bensì piuttosto di termini </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ordinatori</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – stante come </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’inosservanza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dei medesimi non comporti </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>alcuna causa inficiante la validità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procedura</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> né veruna </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conseguente illegittimità dei relativi atti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, non recando seco </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>alcuna decadenza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell’Amministrazione dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>potere di provvedere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, seppure </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tardivamente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – nondimeno la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>violazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dei ridetti termini implica </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>effetti di altro genere </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">ed in particolare talune </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità disciplinari, penali, contabili </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">nonché </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcitorie</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danni da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, laddove siano presenti tutti i relativi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>presupposti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Per il Consiglio peraltro il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>solo ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nell’adozione di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>atto amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è da assumersi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>elemento sufficiente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per configurare </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>un danno “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>ingiusto</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, con conseguente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>obbligo di risarcimento</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>ex parte publica</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, nel caso di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procedimento amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> lesivo di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interesse pretensivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell’amministrato, allorché tale procedimento sia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>da concludere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il destinatario ovvero comunque sussistano </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fondate ragioni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per ritenere che l’interessato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>avrebbe dovuto ottenere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> tale provvedimento favorevole; l’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ingiustizia</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sussistenza stessa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo della P.A.</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> non possono peraltro, in linea di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>principio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>presumersi </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>iuris tantum</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, in </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>meccanica ed esclusiva relazione al ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nell’adozione del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento amministrativo favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dovendo piuttosto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il soggetto danneggiato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>ex</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art. 2697</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> c.c., provare </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tutti gli elementi costitutivi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della pertinente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>domanda</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dovendosi più in specie verificare la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sussistenza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> tanto dei </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>presupposti di carattere oggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prova del danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e del relativo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ammontare</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ingiustizia</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dello stesso, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nesso causale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">), tanto di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>quello di carattere soggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dolo o colpa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del danneggiante), onde il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mero “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>superamento</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>” del termine</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> fissato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>ex lege</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (o per via regolamentare) alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conclusione del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> costituisce </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>indice oggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> senza tuttavia integrare “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>piena prova del danno</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">” da ritardo medesimo. Per il Collegio, con riguardo alla specifica fattispecie sottopostagli, possono </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>assumersi sussistenti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> i </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>presupposti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento del danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nel caso di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>esito favorevole del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procedura di VIA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con l’emissione del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento finale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, che ha consentito al privato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’ottenimento del bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ovvero </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’ampliamento dell’attività economica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da esso gestita, accompagnato da una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>palese ed oggettiva inosservanza dei termini procedimentali</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> non </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giustificata</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da rilievi da parte dell’Amministrazione, in sede </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ovvero in sede </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giudiziale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>difficoltà oggettive di tipo tecnico o organizzativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> rispetto al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concreto affare trattato,</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in simili evenienze </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dovendo considerarsi raggiunta la prova</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>elemento soggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della pertinente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fattispecie risarcitoria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 12 aprile esce la sentenza della sezione II ter del Tar Lazio n.4329 che muove dalla considerazione onde </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>previsione dell’art. 2 </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>bis</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><a href="http://www.lexitalia.it/n/1015"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">L. 241/1990</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> - ai sensi del quale la P.A. </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>è tenuta al risarcimento del danno ingiusto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> cagionato in conseguenza </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’inosservanza dolosa o colposa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine di conclusione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del procedimento - </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non costituisce</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fattispecie autonoma di illecito</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ma è piuttosto da </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ricondursi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>più ampio </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>genus</b></i></span><i> </i><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>illecito aquiliano</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>all’art. 2043</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> c.c., di cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>condivide gli elementi costitutivi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della responsabilità, col precipitato onde </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’ingiustizia</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sussistenza stessa del danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> non possono, in linea di principio, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>presumersi </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>iuris tantum</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, in </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>meccanica ed esclusiva relazione al ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> o al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>silenzio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nell’adozione del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e ciò in quanto, diversamente opinando, la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>disposizione in questione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> varrebbe a configurare una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sanzione per il ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diritto al risarcimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Per il Collegio poi, al fine di assumere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sussistente il danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della P.A., il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danneggiato deve</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>ex</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art. 2697</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> c.c., </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provare</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la sussistenza di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tutti gli elementi costitutivi della relativa domanda</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e, in particolare, sia dei </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>presupposti di carattere oggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prova del danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e del relativo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ammontare</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ingiustizia</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dello stesso, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nesso causale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">), sia di quelli di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>carattere soggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dolo o colpa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del danneggiante pubblico), palesandosi in particolare </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>necessaria la dimostrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della sussistenza dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>elemento soggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della responsabilità, non potendo ritenersi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sussistente la responsabilità della P.A.</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in applicazione di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mero automatismo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (anche quale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mera presunzione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) in base al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>solo dato oggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>illegittimità del provvedimento adottato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> o dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>illegittimo ed ingiustificato procrastinarsi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>adozione del provvedimento finale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Il Collegio considera come il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procedimento amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sia soggetto ad un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine naturale e ragionevole di conclusione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> variamente fissato nei </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>regolamenti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> applicabili a ciascuna fattispecie, o, in mancanza, regolato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>in via residuale dalla legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e la cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>inosservanza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, laddove comporti un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno ingiusto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> a carico dell’istante, obbliga la P.A. al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pertinente risarcimento,</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> confrontandosi in giurisprudenza sul punto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diversi orientamenti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, tra i quali </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>uno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è volto a considerare </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’interesse alla tempestiva conclusione del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> come un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>bene giuridico a sé stante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tutela il fattore tempo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> come </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>elemento del patrimonio del privato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (il quale ha dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diritto ad una risposta</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tempi ragionevoli</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da parte della P.A., </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>quale che sia il relativo contenuto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di merito, ovvero sia per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>istanze fondate</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che per istanze infondate); ed </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>un altro</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> secondo cui il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento del danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è dovuto – al cospetto di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>specifici presupposti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>solo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in caso di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fondatezza della pertinente pretesa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. In entrambi i casi nondimeno, per il Tar </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non appare configurabile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mero automatismo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> tra </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>illegittimità del silenzio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>presupposto soggettivo della tutela aquiliana</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, in quanto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diversamente opinando</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> si trasformerebbe il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (quale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>misura ripristinatoria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>situazione giuridica lesa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) in una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>forma esclusiva di sanzione,</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> quest’ultima muovendo da </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>presupposti del tutto diversi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, specie in punto di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>quantificazione della misura</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del dovuto, che dovrebbe essere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>predeterminato per legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> o comunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>determinabile</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sulla base della legge stessa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. Scendendo alla fattispecie concreta scandagliata, per il Tar </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non può essere accolta</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la domanda – spiccata </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nei confronti della P.A.</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dai </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>vincitori di un concorso pubblico</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – e volta ad ottenere il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento del danno derivante dal ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con il quale gli stessi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sono stati assunti alle dipendenze dell’Amministrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> medesima, nel caso in cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tale ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sia stato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>determinato dalla scelta della P.A.</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>attendere l’esito del contenzioso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> promosso dagli </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>istanti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> avverso i </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimenti di autotutela</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> adottati dall’Amministrazione in merito alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>medesima procedura concorsuale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; in relazione a tale scelta, infatti, sotto il profilo della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità della P.A.,</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è sicuramente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ascrivibile una colpa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> od </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>una negligenza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> all’apparato amministrativo, configurandosi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>uno di quei naturali imprevisti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che possono determinare un</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b> rallentamento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conclusione del procedimento amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">. La scelta della P.A. di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>proseguire o non proseguire</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il procedimento in presenza di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>contenzioso pendente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – chiosa il Tar - ancorché sulla base di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>atti o provvedimenti impugnati e non sospesi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è, secondo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>comune esperienza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>scelta da compiersi caso per caso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e secondo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ragionevolezza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, soppesando i </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diversi interessi in conflitto,</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> non essendo dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>censurabile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, in termini di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>colpevolezza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ai fini del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento del danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, la decisione di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>attendere l’esito di un giudizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>incide sul procedimento in corso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, laddove da tale procedimento scaturisca </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’assunzione all’impiego dei vincitori</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, o comunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’instaurarsi di un rapporto durevole di collaborazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con la P.A., posto che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’eventuale soccombenza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> potrebbe determinare, nel caso di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>avvenuta instaurazione del rapporto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> durante la pendenza del giudizio, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>delicate conseguenze funzionali ed economiche</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al venir meno, con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>effetto retroattivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>titolo stesso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del rapporto.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 21 aprile esce la sentenza della V sezione del Consiglio di Stato n.1584 alla cui stregua il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della PA deve assumersi avere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>connotati “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>aquiliani</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; come tale, esso </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non può essere presunto o ipotetico</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dovendo essere piuttosto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rigorosamente provato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da chi lo invoca in </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tutti i relativi elementi costitutivi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ex art.</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2967</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> c.c., in combinato disposto con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’art.2043</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> c.c.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2017</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 12 gennaio esce la sentenza della I sezione del Tar Campania, Salerno, n.87, che assume </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>accoglibile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>domanda di risarcimento del danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> avanzata nei confronti di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>un Comune</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e derivante dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo, grave ed ingiustificato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, con il quale è stato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>portato a termine</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (nella specie, dopo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>10 anni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dal pertinente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>avvio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">), il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procedimento amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> avente ad oggetto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>una istanza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, presentata dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>proprietario</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>manufatto abitativo e</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> tendente ad </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ottenere il rilascio del permesso di costruire</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per l’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ampliamento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del medesimo manufatto; in materia di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento dei danni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – chiosa il Tar - spetta a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>colui</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>assume di essere danneggiato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> fornire, e in modo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rigoroso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prova dell’esistenza del pregiudizio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> denunciato, specie se di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>natura patrimoniale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, poiché </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nell’azione di responsabilità per danni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>principio dispositivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> opera con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pienezza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non è temperato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>metodo acquisitivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> proprio </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dell’azione di annullamento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dato che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non si riscontra alcuna asimmetria informativa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> tra </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Amministrazione e privato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ma, anzi, opera il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>principio della c.d. vicinanza della prova</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, che determina il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>riespandersi del predetto principio dispositivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sancito, in generale, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dall’art. 2697 comma 1</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, c.c.; né è ammessa per il Tar la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>valutazione equitativa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, prevista dall’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art. 1226</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> c.c., perché essa presuppone che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risulti comunque comprovata</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> l’esistenza di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno risarcibile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, fatta salva la presenza di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>situazioni di impossibilità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (o di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>estrema difficoltà</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) di presentare una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>puntuale prova</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> solo sul </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>preciso ammontare del danno subito</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 7 febbraio esce la sentenza della VII sezione del Tar Campania n.770 alla cui stregua il riconoscimento della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tardivo esercizio della funzione amministrativa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – danno </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – richiede, oltre alla constatazione della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>perpetrata violazione dei termini procedimentali</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, anche l’accertamento che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’inosservanza delle cadenze procedimentali</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>imputabile a colpa o dolo della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> medesima, che il danno lamentato è </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conseguenza diretta ed immediata del ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell’Amministrazione in parola e che sia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>data prova dal privato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> istante del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno subito</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dal ritardo.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 17 luglio esce la sentenza della II sezione del Tar Campania, Salerno, n.1223, che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>accoglie</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la domanda spiccata da un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>imprenditore commerciale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nei confronti di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Comune</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ed intesa ad ottenere il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento del danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> subito in conseguenza del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con il quale è stato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concluso il procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> avente ad oggetto la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>richiesta di un permesso di costruire</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’ampliamento di un fabbricato a destinazione commerciale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, nel caso in cui: a) </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’istanza tendente ad ottenere il rilascio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dell’atto di assenso edificatorio sia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>divenuta improcedibile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> a causa della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>entrata in vigore del <a href="http://www.lexitalia.it/n/2012">D.p.r. 7 settembre 2010 n. 160</a></b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, secondo cui, a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>decorrere dal 30 settembre 2011</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non è più possibile avvalersi del Suap</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per l’autorizzazione all’apertura delle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>medie e grandi strutture commerciali</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; b) la parte istante abbia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dato idonea dimostrazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>medesima istanza sarebbe stata accolta</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> se il procedimento </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>si fosse concluso tempestivamente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2018</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 2 gennaio esce la sentenza della VI sezione del Consiglio di Stato n.12, che premette come la regola del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>ne bis in idem</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, applicabile anche al processo amministrativo, presupponga l’identità nei due giudizi delle parti in causa e degli elementi identificativi dell’azione proposta, e quindi che nei suddetti giudizi sia chiesto l’annullamento degli stessi provvedimenti, o al più di provvedimenti diversi ma legati da uno stretto vincolo di consequenzialità in quanto inerenti ad un medesimo rapporto, sulla base di identici motivi di impugnazione, onde al fine di reputare sussistente la violazione del principio del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>ne bis in idem</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è necessario rilevare l’identità nei due giudizi delle parti in causa e degli elementi identificativi dell’azione risarcitoria proposta. Sulla base di tali presupposti, per il Collegio la parte che, in sede di decisione giurisdizionale, non abbia ottenuto dal giudice adito il risarcimento del danno richiesto non può riproporre con un giudizio di ottemperanza il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>petitum</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che gli era stato espressamente negato dalla sentenza ottemperanda, ostandovi non solo il ridetto principio del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>ne bis in idem</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ma anche i confini propri del giudizio di ottemperanza medesimo. Sul crinale sostanziale, per il Collegio l’’intervenuto riconoscimento, da parte della PA di aver pronunciato in ritardo su alcune istanze non comporta, per ciò solo, l’affermazione della relativa responsabilità per “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>danno ingiusto</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">” risarcibile ai sensi dell’art. 2043 c.c., dovendosi per esso intendere non qualsiasi perdita economica, ma solo la perdita economica ingiusta, ovvero verificatasi con modalità contrarie al diritto; ne consegue per il Collegio la necessità, per chiunque pretenda un risarcimento, di dimostrare la c.d. spettanza del bene della vita, ovvero la necessità di allegare e provare di essere titolare, in base ad una norma giuridica, del bene della vita che ha perduto e di cui attraverso la domanda giudiziale vorrebbe ottenere l’equivalente economico. Più in specie, per il Consiglio la pretesa risarcitoria relativa al danno da ritardo deve essere ricondotta allo schema generale dell’art. 2043 c.c., con conseguente applicazione rigorosa del principio dell’onere della prova in capo al danneggiato circa la sussistenza di tutti i presupposti oggettivi e soggettivi dell’illecito aquiliano, con l’avvertenza che, nell’azione di responsabilità per danni, il principio dispositivo scolpito in generale all’art. 2697, comma 1, c.c., opera con pienezza, e non è temperato dal metodo acquisitivo proprio dell’azione di annullamento. Il principio di cui all’art. 1227 comma 2 c.c., pur se non espressamente richiamato dall’art. 30 comma 3, c.p.a., per orientamento costante viene reputato dal Collegio come pacificamente applicabile nel processo amministrativo – onde l’omessa attivazione da parte dell’interessato degli strumenti di tutela previsti costituisce, nel quadro del comportamento complessivo delle parti, dato valutabile, alla stregua del canone di buona fede e del principio di solidarietà, ai fini dell’esclusione o della riduzione del danno evitabile con l’ordinaria diligenza, in una logica che vede l’omessa attivazione dei rimedi di tutela (nella specie ad esempio tramite riproposizione dei vizi erroneamente assorbiti ovvero attivazione del rimedio dell’ottemperanza) non più come preclusione di rito, ma come fatto da considerare in sede di merito ai fini del giudizio sulla sussistenza e consistenza del pregiudizio risarcibile.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 19 giugno esce la sentenza del TRGA di Trento n.141 che ritiene di poter accogliere la domanda di risarcimento del danno subito da una società in conseguenza del ritardo con il quale la locale Camera di commercio, industria, artigianato e agricoltura ha provveduto ad iscriverla nel registro delle imprese nel caso in cui, a causa di tale ritardo, alla medesima società non sia stato concesso un contributo pubblico; in tal caso, infatti, sussiste per il Tar il nesso di causalità diretta, e comunque efficiente, fra la violazione della tempistica stabilita dalla legge per la suddetta iscrizione in CCIAA ed il danno reclamato dalla impresa istante, atteso che se la ridetta domanda di iscrizione nel registro delle imprese fosse stata evasa dalla Camera di commercio nel termine di 5 giorni dalla data di presentazione, l’iscrizione sarebbe stata tempestiva, e dunque la PA incaricata di vagliare l’ammissibilità della domanda di contributo non avrebbe potuto adottare il provvedimento di diniego.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 10 ottobre esce la sentenza della V sezione del Consiglio di Stato n.5834 alla cui stregua i</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">l risarcimento del danno da ritardo relativo ad un interesse legittimo pretensivo non può essere assunto avulso da una valutazione concernente la spettanza del bene della vita ed è da intendersi subordinato, tra l’altro, anche alla dimostrazione che l’aspirazione al provvedimento sia destinata ad esito favorevole e quindi alla dimostrazione della spettanza definitiva del bene della vita collegato a tale interesse; ciò in quanto – chiosa il Collegio - l’entrata in vigore dell’art. 2-</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>bis</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><a href="http://www.lexitalia.it/n/1015"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">legge n. 241 del 1990</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> non ha elevato a bene della vita, suscettibile di autonoma protezione mediante il risarcimento del danno, l’interesse procedimentale al rispetto dei termini dell’azione amministrativa in modo avulso da ogni riferimento alla spettanza dell’interesse sostanziale, al cui conseguimento il procedimento stesso è finalizzato. Per il Collegio il riconoscimento della responsabilità dell’Amministrazione per il tardivo esercizio della funzione amministrativa richiede, oltre alla constatazione della violazione dei termini del procedimento, l’accertamento che l’inosservanza delle cadenze procedimentali è imputabile a colpa o dolo dell’Amministrazione medesima, che il danno lamentato è conseguenza diretta ed immediata del ritardo dell’Amministrazione, nonché la prova del danno lamentato. Entrando </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>in medias res</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, per il Collegio in caso di revoca dell’aggiudicazione da parte della stazione appaltante, va presunta la restituzione all’aggiudicatario della cauzione provvisoria (ed eventualmente anche di quella definitiva, ove versata), che deve essere richiesta e le cui pertinenti voci non possono dunque essere conteggiate in sede di risarcimento del danno, neppure a titolo di responsabilità precontrattuale: peraltro, la possibilità che all’aggiudicazione provvisoria della gara non faccia seguito quella definitiva è da assumersi evento del tutto fisiologico, che esclude qualsivoglia affidamento tutelabile; onde la revoca (come pure l’annullamento) dell’aggiudicazione provvisoria non richiede la previa comunicazione di avvio del procedimento, trattandosi di atto endoprocedimentale che si inserisce nell’ambito del procedimento di scelta del contraente come momento necessario, ma non decisivo, solamente l’aggiudicazione definitiva attribuendo in modo stabile il bene della vita ed essendo pertanto idonea ad ingenerare un affidamento in capo all’aggiudicatario, sì da imporre l’instaurazione del contraddittorio procedimentale; né l’eventuale lungo tempo trascorso tra l’aggiudicazione provvisoria e la revoca della stessa, nonché dell’intera gara, può mutare la natura giuridica di atto provvisorio, ad effetti instabili, dell’aggiudicazione, atteso che il termine di 30 giorni stabilito dall’art. 12 del </span><a href="http://www.lexitalia.it/n/1686"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">d.lgs. n. 163 del 2006</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> comporta solamente che l’aggiudicazione si consideri, nel silenzio dell’Amministrazione, approvata, ma non che essa determini l’aggiudicazione definitiva, la quale resta sempre sottoposta alla verifica del possesso dei pertinenti requisiti in capo all’aggiudicataria. Sempre per il Collegio, la responsabilità precontrattuale può coesistere con un provvedimento legittimo, ponendosi in funzione del comportamento scorretto, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>melius</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> contrario ai canoni della buona fede e correttezza; ciò tuttavia non toglie che sia onere della parte provare, anche in via presuntiva, ma sulla base di allegazioni di fatto certe e precise, il pregiudizio subito, nei limiti dell’interesse negativo, e cioè il danno-evento (la lesione della libertà di autodeterminazione negoziale) ed il danno conseguenza (le perdite economiche subite a causa delle scelte negoziali illecitamente condizionate), nonché i relativi rapporti di causalità tra tali danni e la condotta scorretta che si imputa all’Amministrazione. In questa importante sentenza il Consiglio di Stato tratta tanto della responsabilità della PA per ritardo procedimentale, quanto di quella precontrattuale, accomunandole giusta predicata appartenenza di entrambe al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>genus</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della responsabilità aquiliana, con tutto quanto ne deriva in termini di elementi costitutivi dell’illecito, di onere della prova di tali elementi, nonché delle voci di pertinente danno.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2019</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 9 maggio esce la sentenza dell’Adunanza Plenaria del Consiglio di Stato n. 7 che preliminarmente richiama le conclusioni di cui all’Adunanza Plenaria 15/2014 in tema di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>astreinte</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">,</span><i> </i><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">definite come: “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>una misura coercitiva indiretta a carattere pecuniario, inquadrabile nell’ambito delle pene private o delle sanzioni civili indirette, che mira a vincere la resistenza del debitore, inducendolo ad adempiere all’ obbligazione sancita a suo carico dall’ordine del giudice</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">” risolvendosi in un “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>meccanismo automatico di irrogazione di penalità pecuniarie in vista dell’assicurazione dei valori dell’effettività e della pienezza della tutela giurisdizionale a fronte della mancata o non esatta o non tempestiva esecuzione delle sentenze emesse nei confronti della pubblica amministrazione e, più in generale, della parte risultata soccombente all’esito del giudizio di cognizione</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">E’ evidente l’ambivalenza della ricostruzione legata alla natura necessariamente condizionale della relativa statuizione giudiziale di condanna: proiettata verso il futuro in funzione compulsoria di un adempimento della parte pubblica; ma applicabile sono una volta che l’inadempimento si sia concretizzato, così rendendo illecito il comportamento. Un precetto giudiziale che, nella sua funzione e nella sua dinamica, assomiglia molto a quelli normativi di matrice sanzionatoria ai quali pure è associabile una funzione preventiva di carattere dissuasivo ed una repressiva postuma a contenuto pecuniario.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il Collegio arriva quindi ad affermare che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">è sempre possibile in sede di c.d. “ottemperanza di chiarimenti” modificare la statuizione relativa alla penalità di mora contenuta in una precedente sentenza d’ottemperanza, ove siano comprovate sopravvenienze fattuali o giuridiche che dimostrino, in concreto, la manifesta iniquità in tutto o in parte della sua applicazione. </span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Salvo il caso delle sopravvenienze, non è in via generale possibile la revisione </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>ex tunc</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dei criteri di determinazione della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>astreinte </i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">dettati in una precedente sentenza d’ottemperanza, sì da incidere sui crediti a titolo di penalità già maturati dalla parte beneficiata. Tuttavia, ove il giudice dell’ottemperanza non abbia esplicitamente fissato, a causa dell’indeterminata progressività del criterio dettato, il tetto massimo della penalità, e la vicenda successiva alla determinazione abbia fatto emergere, a causa proprio della mancanza del tetto, la manifesta iniquità, quest’ultimo può essere individuato in sede di chiarimenti, con principale riferimento, fra i parametri indicati nell’art. 614 bis c.pc., al danno da ritardo nell’esecuzione del giudicato. </span></p> <p class="western" align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">* * *</span></p> <p class="western"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 9 luglio esce la sentenza della II sezione del TAR Sardegna n. 622 che, in tema di risarcimento del danno da ritardo, ricorda come, secondo i principi che regolano la distribuzione dell’onere della prova, ai fini dell’accoglimento della domanda di risarcimento del danno extracontrattuale incombe al ricorrente l’onere di dimostrare la sussistenza di tutti gli elementi tipici della fattispecie di responsabilità, ossia:</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">a) il fatto illecito costituito da una condotta antigiuridica della P.A., rappresentata dall’attività amministrativa illegittima;</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">b) l’evento dannoso, e cioè il danno ingiusto rappresentato dalla lesione della situazione sostanziale protetta di cui il privato è titolare;</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">c) il nesso di causalità tra illegittimità e danno;</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">d) l’elemento soggettivo, nel senso che l’attività illegittima deve essere imputabile all’amministrazione (all’apparato amministrativo, come viene spesso precisato) a titolo di dolo o colpa.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Accanto agli elementi descritti, la giurisprudenza richiede inoltre (sulla scia della citata pronuncia delle Sezioni Unite della Cassazione del 1999) la verifica della spettanza del bene della vita che il privato intende acquisire alla propria sfera giuridica attraverso l’esercizio del potere e l’emanazione del provvedimento amministrativo richiesto. </span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Pertanto, anche nell’ipotesi di inerzia dell’amministrazione, la risarcibilità del danno derivante dalla violazione del termine per provvedere occorre verificare la sussistenza sia dei presupposti di carattere oggettivo, sia di quelli di carattere soggettivo). Con l’ulteriore precisazione che la valutazione di questi ultimi (dolo o colpa della p.a.) non può essere fondata soltanto sul dato oggettivo del superamento del termine di conclusione del procedimento amministrativo; in ogni caso, infatti, occorre quantomeno verificare se il comportamento dell’apparato amministrativo abbia travalicato i canoni della correttezza e della buona amministrazione, ovvero sia trasmodato in negligenza, omissioni o errori interpretativi di norme, ritenuti non scusabili. Con la conseguenza che la responsabilità deve essere negata quando la violazione dei termini procedimentali sia dipesa dalla sussistenza di contrasti giurisprudenziali o dall'incertezza del quadro normativo di riferimento o dalla complessità della situazione di fatto.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2020</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 2 maggio esce la sentenza della I sezione del TAR Marche n. 267 onde l'art. 2-bis della L. n. 241 del 1990 non ha elevato a distinto bene della vita, suscettibile di un'autonoma protezione mediante il risarcimento del danno, l'interesse procedimentale al rispetto dei termini dell'azione amministrativa, con la conseguenza che non è possibile riconoscere una tutela risarcitoria sul mero rilievo del ritardo dell'azione amministrativa, occorrendo sempre procedere ad una valutazione di merito sulla spettanza in capo all'interessato del bene sostanziale. Ai sensi dell'art. 2 della L. n. 241 del 1990, le pubbliche amministrazioni sono tenute al risarcimento del danno ingiusto, cagionato in conseguenza dell'inosservanza dolosa o colposa del termine di conclusione del procedimento; peraltro l'ingiustizia e la sussistenza stessa del danno non possono, in linea di principio, presumersi, in meccanica ed esclusiva relazione al ritardo o al silenzio nell'adozione del provvedimento amministrativo, ma il danneggiato deve, ex art. 2697 c.c., provare la sussistenza di tutti gli elementi costitutivi della relativa domanda e, in particolare, sia dei presupposti di carattere oggettivo (prova del danno e del suo ammontare, ingiustizia dello stesso, nesso causale), sia di quello di carattere soggettivo (dolo o colpa del danneggiante).</span></p> <p class="western" align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">* * *</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il 21 aprile esce la sentenza della V sezione del Consiglio di Stato n. 2534 onde l'annullamento di un provvedimento amministrativo per vizi tralatiziamente definiti formali, quali il difetto di istruttoria o di motivazione, o procedimentali (come il vizio di incompetenza), in quanto non contiene alcun accertamento in ordine alla spettanza del bene della vita coinvolto dal provvedimento impugnato, non consente di accogliere la domanda finalizzata al perseguimento della pretesa sostanziale, quale è il risarcimento del danno. Infatti mentre la caducazione dell'atto per vizi sostanziali vincola l'amministrazione ad attenersi, nella successiva attività, alle statuizioni del giudice, l'annullamento fondato su profili formali non elimina né riduce il potere della stessa di provvedere in ordine allo stesso oggetto dell'atto annullato e lascia ampio potere in merito all'amministrazione, con il solo limite negativo di riesercizio nelle stesse caratterizzazioni di cui si è accertata l'illegittimità, sicchè non può ritenersi condizionata o determinata in positivo la decisione finale.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Ciò in quanto il risarcimento del danno non è una conseguenza automatica e costante dell'annullamento giurisdizionale di un provvedimento amministrativo, ma richiede la verifica di tutti i requisiti dell'illecito (condotta, colpa, nesso di causalità, evento dannoso) e, nel caso di richiesta di risarcimento del danno conseguente alla lesione di un interesse legittimo pretensivo, è subordinato alla dimostrazione, secondo un giudizio prognostico, con accertamento in termini di certezza o, quanto meno, di probabilità vicina alla certezza, che il provvedimento sarebbe stato rilasciato in assenza dell'agire illegittimo della pubblica amministrazione.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Ed infatti per danno ingiusto risarcibile ai sensi dell'art. 2043 cod. civ. si intende non qualsiasi perdita economica, ma solo la perdita economica ingiusta, ovvero verificatasi con modalità contrarie al diritto; ne consegue quindi la necessità, per chiunque pretenda un risarcimento, di dimostrare la c.d. spettanza del bene della vita, ovvero la necessità di allegare e provare di essere titolare, in base ad una norma giuridica, del bene della vita che ha perduto od al quale anela, e di cui attraverso la domanda giudiziale vorrebbe ottenere l'equivalente economico.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Prima del riesercizio dell'azione amministrativa è impossibile enucleare la configurabilità di un collegamento causale tra il danno lamentato ed il comportamento procedimentale dell'Amministrazione.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">Il danno da ritardo, infatti, non può essere avulso da una valutazione concernente la spettanza del bene della vita, e deve, quindi, essere subordinato, tra l'altro, anche alla dimostrazione che l'aspirazione al provvedimento sia destinata ad esito favorevole, e quindi alla dimostrazione della spettanza definitiva del bene sostanziale della vita collegato ad un tale interesse.</span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Questioni intriganti</b></span></p> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Cosa si intende per danno “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>da ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”?</b></span></p> <ol type="a"> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">si tratta di una fattispecie detta anche danno “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>da silenzio</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”;</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">si compendia, in sostanza, nella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>lesione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interesse legittimo di tipo pretensivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> perpetrata da un’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Amministrazione pubblica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">;</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">la PA si configura dunque come </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>colpevole del ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nell’adozione di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento chiestole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, che da tale ritardo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>lamenta un danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">;</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">il privato istante che chiede il c.d. </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> fa valere dunque una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che, a seconda della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prospettiva</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, può identificarsi quale: d.1) </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità aquiliana</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ex art.</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2043</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> c.c.; d.2) responsabilità “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>contrattuale</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”, o meglio da </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>violazione di obbligo precostituito</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ex art.</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>1218</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> c.c.;</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">le </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>possibili fattispecie di danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> isolate dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dottrina</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sono </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>3</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ovvero: e.1) annullamento di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento sfavorevole</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>illegittimo </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">e </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardata adozione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento legittimo favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; si tratta </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>in realtà</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> non tanto di responsabilità </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, quanto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>da provvedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>annullamento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in quanto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sfavorevole ma illegittimo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> implica </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo nell’adozione del </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">pertinente</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b> provvedimento legittimo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; e.2) danno prodotto da </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento legittimo favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ma </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tardivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (e che dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>si è fatto attendere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, pur </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>palesandosi alfine favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al privato istante); qui il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento finale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legittimo favorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e dunque la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> va ricondotta al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (che è appunto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legittimo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">); e.3) danno prodotto da </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento legittimo sfavorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ma </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tardivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (e che dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>si è fatto attendere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>palesarsi sfavorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al privato istante); anche qui il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento finale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legittimo </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">ma</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b> sfavorevole</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e dunque la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> va ricondotta al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (che è appunto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legittimo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, seppure sfavorevole all’istante);</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">dal punto di vista </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>processuale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, si sono in passato posti </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2 problemi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">: f.1) a </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>quale giudice</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>GA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> o </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>GO</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, va chiesto il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pertinente risarcimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del danno; f.2) se la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>regola della pregiudiziale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> debba valere non solo per il caso in cui la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>richiesta di risarcimento danni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>subordinata</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> all’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>annullamento dell’atto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ma anche </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>all’annullamento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (o comunque all’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>accertamento della illegittimità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del) “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>silenzio</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>” della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dal quale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è scaturito; la regola della pregiudiziale è stata tuttavia superata </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dall’art.30</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del c.p.a. del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2010</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; </span></p> </li> </ol> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>In cosa consiste il danno da “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”.</b></span></p> <ol type="a"> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>presupposto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di questo tipo di danno è ovviamente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il ritardo della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conclusione del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, giusta </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>adozione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del pertinente </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">;</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">il danno </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>da “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>mero</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>” ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> presuppone </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il solo ritardo</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>in sé</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> considerato;</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">si </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prescinde</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dunque in primo luogo, ed in ottica </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sostanziale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dalla effettiva </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>spettanza del bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al privato istante, potendo dunque questi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>invocare il risarcimento dei danni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> anche laddove </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tale bene non gli spetti</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> o, detto altrimenti, anche laddove </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>il proprio interesse</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>alfine assunto dalla PA legittimamente incompatibile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con l’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interesse pubblico</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">;</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">si </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prescinde</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> poi, sul crinale formale, dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>stessa effettiva adozione del provvedimento finale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>relativo contenuto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, onde il privato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>può invocare il risarcimento del danno anche</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> laddove la PA </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non adotti mai il provvedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ad essa dalla legge demandato, ed anche laddove </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>lo adotti con un contenuto non perfettamente conforme</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> alla relativa </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pretesa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, a valle di una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>valutazione della compatibilità del proprio interesse</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>quello pubblico</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">;</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">in passato, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prima dell’introduzione dell’art.2.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (giusta </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>decreto legislativo 69.09</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">), si sono registrate in dottrina </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>posizioni di approfondimento progressivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, onde: e.1) dapprima il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>solo fatto del ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>genericamente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> inteso, fonda la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, anche </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>lasciando da parte</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> qualsivoglia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>indagine</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in ordine alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>spettanza in capo al privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>utilità finale anelata</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, o </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; e.2) dipoi, più </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>specificamente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, il fatto che la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>regola violata</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dalla PA abbia </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>natura procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> non esclude il fatto che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>essa stessa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (la regola procedimentale) </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sottenda un bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (autonomamente) </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>riconoscibile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in capo al privato istante, e dunque un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interesse dalla medesima protetto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, sicché occorre </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non confondere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>natura procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>regola violata </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>ex parte publica</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con gli </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interessi che tale regola</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (procedimentale) presidia; nelle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>gare</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, nei </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concorsi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e più in generale in </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ogni procedimento amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, la disciplina del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pertinente termine</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è orientata a fornire una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>certezza temporale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al privato istante, il che caratterizza </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ogni aspetto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della relativa </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>partecipazione al procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, giacché egli per parteciparvi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>vi impegna risorse</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rinuncia ad altre opportunità</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (massime se </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>imprenditore commerciale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) e talvolta si avvale di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>circostanze favorevoli</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, durante la partecipazione, che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non possono assumersi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> avere una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>durata indefinita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, affiorando dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diversi interessi sostanziali</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diversi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da quello sotteso al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>bene della vita “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>principale</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del singolo procedimento considerato – che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>meritano anch’essi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, laddove </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>lesi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (giusta ritardo imputabile alla PA) una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tutela risarcitoria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; in questa </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>più profonda</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> prospettiva, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ogni violazione di obbligo procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – ivi compreso quello di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>rispettare il termine</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> fissato per il singolo procedimento – </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>può implicare</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (e normalmente implica) la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>lesione di interessi sostanziali</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>altri</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">” e </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diversi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da quello che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ha a diretto oggetto il bene della vita “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>proprio</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del singolo procedimento, e ciò in quanto si realizza tra PA e privato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>un contatto qualificato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> capace di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>svincolare la tutela risarcitoria</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giudizio sulla spettanza del bene della vita “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>finale</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (o comunque sulle </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>chance</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di conseguire tale bene) secondo un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>meccanismo analogo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> a quello che nel </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diritto civile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> fonda i c.d. </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>obblighi di protezione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>senza prestazione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">), con conseguente riconduzione della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> alla tipologia “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>contrattuale da contatto</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">” piuttosto che a quella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>aquiliana</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">;</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dopo l’introduzione dell’art.2.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (giusta </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>decreto legislativo 69.09</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">), si sono registrate </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>in dottrina</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sostanzialmente due posizioni: f.1) una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>prima prospettiva ermeneutica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> muove dalla circostanza onde la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcibilità del danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è stata </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>riconosciuta dal legislatore</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in modo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>esplicito e senza condizioni</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’art.7</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del decreto legislativo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>69.09</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, che inserisce nella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legge 241.90 l’art.2.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, reca la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>significativa rubrica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>certezza</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i> nei </i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>tempi di conclusione</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i> del procedimento</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”, e dunque sembra </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>innovare il sistema</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">: più in specie, il legislatore </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pone a base del potenziale danno</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>solo il ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della PA, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>senza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che il relativo risarcimento </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sia condizionato alla spettanza effettiva</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’istante anela</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, spettanza </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>che il GA non è dunque tenuto ad accertare</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al fine di verificare la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>natura dannosa del ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> medesimo; ciò implica che può ormai </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>produrre danno anche solo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mero ritardo della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nell’adozione del provvedimento, </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>quand’anche negativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e dunque </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anche</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”; secondo questa opzione ermeneutica peraltro la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>responsabilità della PA per il ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nell’adozione del provvedimento </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ha natura “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>contrattuale</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, campeggiando nella pertinente fattispecie un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>autonomo diritto soggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del privato alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tempestiva conclusione del procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, circostanza capace di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giustificare l’attribuzione al GA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giurisdizione esclusiva</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, stante appunto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’intreccio tra diritti soggettivi e interessi legittimi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che connota </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>la materia</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ritardo provvedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e gli </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>eventuali danni che vi si ricollegano</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) affidata appunto alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giurisdizione esclusiva del GA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; in altri termini, il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>legislatore del 2009</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ha inteso </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>significativamente innovare il sistema</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> connotando il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fattore “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>tempo procedimentale</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> quale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>autonomo interesse protetto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in guisa di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>diritto soggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dovendosi allora assumere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcibile anche il danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> da c.d. “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”, e dunque anche il danno </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>scaturigine del ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nell’adozione da parte della PA di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento negativo legittimo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; f.2) una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>seconda prospettiva</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> alla cui stregua </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>nulla è mutato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in tema di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non risarcibilità del danno c.d. da mero ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, conformemente all’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>indirizzo tradizionale</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>contrario</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> appunto ad assumere tale risarcibilità; ciò tenendo conto del fatto – sul crinale dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interpretazione c.d. “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>storica</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’art.2.bis</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non ha riproposto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> la previsione di cui al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>disegno di legge Nicolais</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (Atto Senato 1859) che, nel prevedere una </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>norma di tenore analogo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> a quello del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>neo introdotto art.2.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della legge 241.90, assumeva nondimeno </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>esplicitamente risarcibile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>indipendentemente</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i> dalla </i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>spettanza</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i> del </i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>beneficio</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i> derivante dal </i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>provvedimento richiesto</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”, con inciso che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non essendo stato riproposto </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>expressis verbis</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in tali termini dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>novella del 2009</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (ancorché </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’originario disegno di legge</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> - Atto Camera 1441 - riproponesse </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>quel medesimo testo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, poi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>modificato nella versione alfine approvata</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">), viene interpretato da questa opzione ermeneutica quale </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>freccia nell’arco della tesi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> onde l’art.2.bis </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non prevede</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> appunto la ristorabilità del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno da c.d. “</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>”</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, rivelandosi peraltro “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>neutra</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">” la previsione della </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giurisdizione esclusiva del GA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, tesa </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>esclusivamente a confermare</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> appunto la </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giurisdizione di tale giudice</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> al cospetto di fattispecie di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>spendita in ogni caso</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>potere pubblico</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">;</span></p> </li> </ol> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Cosa distingue il danno da ritardo dal danno c.d. “da disturbo”?</b></span></p> <ol type="a"> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">entrambi hanno a presupposto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>una inerzia della PA</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>fuori asse</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> rispetto al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>quadro ordinamentale vigente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">;</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">il danno </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>da ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> si risolve nella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>lesione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interesse pretensivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del privato, che a causa dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>inerzia pubblica</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non si vede erogato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento ampliativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della propria </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>sfera giuridica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> nel termine divisato per la conclusione del procedimento; il privato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non ottiene nei termini</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> quello che dovrebbe (o vorrebbe) ottenere;</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">il danno </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>da disturbo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> si risolve nella </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>lesione</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interesse oppositivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del privato, che a causa dell’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>inerzia pubblica</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> vede </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procrastinarsi</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> oltre il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>normale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ed il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tollerabile</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> gli effetti di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>provvedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (o di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>procedimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>conculca le proprie facoltà di godimento</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in quanto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>proprietario</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>determinato bene</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; il privato </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ha già</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ma </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>non può pienamente godere</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> di quello che ha.</span></p> </li> </ol> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>Cosa distingue – in tema di ritardo – l’indennizzo dal risarcimento del danno?</b></span></p> <ol type="a"> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">l’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>indennizzo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (previsto, a partire dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2013</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, dall’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art.2.bis, comma 1.bis</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, della legge </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, in combinato disposto con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>l’art.28</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>decreto legge n.69.13</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, peraltro </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>limitatamente ad alcuni settori procedimentali</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, e segnatamente in tema di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>avvio ed esercizio di attività di impresa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) fa </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>da contraltare</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ad un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>atto lecito dannoso della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ed è connesso alla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>mera scadenza</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>termine procedimentale</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, ristorando dunque il “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">”, in modo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>tutt’affatto sganciato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>spettanza del bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> in capo al </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>privato istante </b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">(e dunque dalla </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>compatibilità o meno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> del relativo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interesse</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> con </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>quello pubblico</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">), senza per giunta che </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>campeggino peculiari oneri di allegazione e prova</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> né sul </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>crinale oggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> né su quello </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>soggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>dolo o colpa</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> della PA);</span></p> </li> <li> <p class="western" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcimento del danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (previsto dall’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>art.2.bis, comma 1</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, della legge </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>241.90</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> a partire dal </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>2009</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, in modo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>generalizzato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> e dunque in relazione ad </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ogni procedimento amministrativo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) si </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>giustappone</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> ad un </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>illecito della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, consistente nel fatto che - pur </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>spettando al privato istante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> (il cui </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>interesse</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> è acclarato alfine </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>compatibile con l’interesse pubblico</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">) l’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>anelato bene della vita</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> – tale bene </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>gli viene erogato in ritardo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per essere </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>concluso in ritardo il pertinente procedimento</b></span> <span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i>ex parte publica</i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; il </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>danno</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che ne consegue </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>va allegato e provato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sia in termini di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>pregiudizio emergente</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> che di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>lucro cessante</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">, così come </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>va provato il dolo o quanto meno la colpa della PA</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> sul versante </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>soggettivo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">; quanto </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>eventualmente già ottenuto</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> a titolo di </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>indennizzo</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> per “</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><i><b>mero ritardo</b></i></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">” va poi </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>scomputato</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> dall’</span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>ammontare</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"> riconosciuto a titolo </span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;"><b>risarcitorio</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial Narrow, Arial Narrow, sans-serif;">.</span></p> </li> </ol>
